Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Single-top $t$-channel production with off-shell and non-resonant effects

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 30 May 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Results are presented for the LHC and compared to those of the narrow-width approximation and effective theory approaches.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1305.7088 (version 1)
Pith IDALHXUHZ3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. S. Papanastasiou, F. Maltoni, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi. "Single-top $t$-channel production with off-shell and non-resonant effects." arXiv:1305.7088 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/ALHXUHZ3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,948 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.48 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This letter details and discusses the next-to-leading order QCD corrections to $t$-channel electro-weak $W^+ b j$ production, where finite top-width effects are consistently taken into account. The computation is done within the aMC@NLO framework and includes both resonant and non-resonant contributions as well as interferences between the two. Results are presented for the LHC and compared to those of the narrow-width approximation and effective theory approaches.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This letter details and discusses the next-to-leading order QCD corrections to $t$-channel electro-weak $W^+ b j$ production, where finite top-width effects are consistently taken into account. contribution 1.00 0.89 0.16 asserted 0.98
s1 The computation is done within the aMC@NLO framework and includes both resonant and non-resonant contributions as well as interferences between the two. method 0.99 0.93 0.08 asserted 1.00
s2 Results are presented for the LHC and compared to those of the narrow-width approximation and effective theory approaches. result 0.76 0.89 0.15 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.58 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This letter details and discusses the next-to-leading order QCD corrections to $t$-channel electro-weak $W^+ b j$ production, where finite top-width effects are consistently taken into account. The computation is done within the aMC@NLO framework and includes both resonant and non-resonant contributions as well as interferences between the two. Results are presented for the LHC and compared to those of the narrow-width approximation and effective theory approaches.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

14 arXiv papers cite this in 29 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 13 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 5 papers

What it cites · 44 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 5 papers
Cites as background 16 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.