Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Non-Universalities in Pure Gravity Mediation

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 31 May 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This generalization allows us to greatly increase the allowed range in \tan \beta and it allows one to find viable solutions with lower m_{3/2}.

how it is stated · asserted 0.91 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1305.7461 (version 1)
Pith IDKJNGPSTA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJason L. Evans, Keith A. Olive, Masahiro Ibe, Tsutomu T. Yanagida. "Non-Universalities in Pure Gravity Mediation." arXiv:1305.7461 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/KJNGPSTA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,880 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.20 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.84 · compares with prior results 0.81 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The simplest model of pure gravity mediation contains only two free parameters: the gravitino mass and \tan\beta. Scalar masses are universal at some high energy renormalization scale and gaugino masses are determined through anomalies and depend on the gravitino mass and the gauge couplings. This theory requires a relatively large gravitino mass (m_{3/2}\gtrsim 300\,TeV) and a limited range in \tan \beta \simeq 1.7--2.5. Here we generalize the theory to allow for non-universality in the Higgs soft masses. This introduces zero, one or two new free parameters associated with Higgs soft masses. This generalization allows us to greatly increase the allowed range in \tan \beta and it allows one to find viable solutions with lower m_{3/2}. The latter is important if we hope to find a low energy signal from gluinos. Some special cases of these non-universalities are suggestive of Higgs bosons as Nambu-Goldstone bosons or a partial no-scale structure for the Higgs doublets. Thus, we probe signatures at the weak scale and structures at the GUT and/or Planck scale.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The simplest model of pure gravity mediation contains only two free parameters: the gravitino mass and \tan\beta. background 1.00 0.09 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 Scalar masses are universal at some high energy renormalization scale and gaugino masses are determined through anomalies and depend on the gravitino mass and the gauge couplings. background 1.00 0.08 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 This theory requires a relatively large gravitino mass (m_{3/2}\gtrsim 300\,TeV) and a limited range in \tan \beta \simeq 1.7--2.5. background 0.96 0.13 0.05 asserted 1.00
s3 Here we generalize the theory to allow for non-universality in the Higgs soft masses. contribution 0.97 0.84 0.06 asserted 0.96
s4 This introduces zero, one or two new free parameters associated with Higgs soft masses. contribution 0.70 0.69 0.07 asserted 0.99
s5 This generalization allows us to greatly increase the allowed range in \tan \beta and it allows one to find viable solutions with lower m_{3/2}. result 0.95 0.83 0.61 asserted 0.91
s6 The latter is important if we hope to find a low energy signal from gluinos. interpretation 0.96 0.13 0.07 hedged possibility 0.44
s7 Some special cases of these non-universalities are suggestive of Higgs bosons as Nambu-Goldstone bosons or a partial no-scale structure for the Higgs doublets. interpretation 0.81 0.49 0.08 hedged possibility 0.96
s8 Thus, we probe signatures at the weak scale and structures at the GUT and/or Planck scale. contribution 0.64 0.74 0.11 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.44.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The simplest model of pure gravity mediation contains only two free parameters: the gravitino mass and \tan\beta. Scalar masses are universal at some high energy renormalization scale and gaugino masses are determined through anomalies and depend on the gravitino mass and the gauge couplings. This theory requires a relatively large gravitino mass (m_{3/2}\gtrsim 300\,TeV) and a limited range in \tan \beta \simeq 1.7--2.5. Here we generalize the theory to allow for non-universality in the Higgs soft masses. This introduces zero, one or two new free parameters associated with Higgs soft masses. This generalization allows us to greatly increase the allowed range in \tan \beta and it allows one to find viable solutions with lower m_{3/2}. The latter is important if we hope to find a low energy signal from gluinos. Some special cases of these non-universalities are suggestive of Higgs bosons as Nambu-Goldstone bosons or a partial no-scale structure for the Higgs doublets. Thus, we probe signatures at the weak scale and structures at the GUT and/or Planck scale.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

23 arXiv papers cite this in 51 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 37 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 2 papers
Compares with it 2 papers
  • Note also that the Higgs masses calculated here differ slightly from those calculated in [ref] as here we are not imposing strict gauge coupling unification at the GUT scale.] for $tanβ$ roughly between 4–9 as shown by the red dot-dashed curves.

    SU(5) Grand Unification in Pure Gravity Mediation · Results · 0.98

  • Note, however, that the $A$-terms in this case are not suppressed by a loop factor contrary to other split-SUSY models based on anomaly mediation [ref] (see, for instance, Refs. [ref] ).

    Naturalizing Supersymmetry with a Two-Field Relaxion Mechanism · The MSSM sector · 0.86

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • In order to reconcile the proton lifetime with the relic density and Higgs mass, we need to consider lower values of $tanβ$ [ref] , which can be accomplished when the GM terms ([ref]) are included [ref] .

    No-Scale SU(5) Super-GUTs · Vacuum Conditions and Renormalization-Group Equations · 0.96

Cites it as background 8 papers

What it cites · 43 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 3 papers
Uses data or values from 1 paper
Cites as support 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.