RECORD
D-branes and $K$-homology
K-Theory and Homology · Submitted 3 Jun 2013
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim It is proposed that a $K$-cycle $[M,E,\phi]$ represents a D-brane configuration wrapping the subspace $\phi(M)$.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
In this thesis the close relationship between the topological $K$-homology group of the spacetime manifold $X$ of string theory and D-branes in string theory is examined. An element of the $K$-homology group is given by an equivalence class of $K$-cycles $[M,E,\phi]$, where $M$ is a closed spin$^c$ manifold, $E$ is a complex vector bundle over $M$, and $\phi: M\rightarrow X$ is a continuous map. It is proposed that a $K$-cycle $[M,E,\phi]$ represents a D-brane configuration wrapping the subspace $\phi(M)$. As a consequence, the $K$-homology element defined by $[M,E,\phi]$ represents a class of D-brane configurations that have the same physical charge. Furthermore, the $K$-cycle representation of D-branes resembles the modern way of characterizing fundamental strings, in which the strings are represented as two-dimensional surfaces with maps into the spacetime manifold. This classification of D-branes also suggests the possibility of physically interpreting D-branes wrapping singular subspaces of spacetime, enlarging the known types of singularities that string theory can cope with.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | In this thesis the close relationship between the topological $K$-homology group of the spacetime manifold $X$ of string theory and D-branes in string theory is examined. | contribution 0.94 | 0.78 | 0.17 | asserted 0.88 |
| s1 | An element of the $K$-homology group is given by an equivalence class of $K$-cycles $[M,E,\phi]$, where $M$ is a closed spin$^c$ manifold, $E$ is a complex vector bundle over $M$, and $\phi: M\rightarrow X$ is a continuous map. | background 0.96 | 0.12 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | It is proposed that a $K$-cycle $[M,E,\phi]$ represents a D-brane configuration wrapping the subspace $\phi(M)$. | interpretation 0.49 | 0.40 | 0.45 | hedged possibility 0.48 |
| s3 | As a consequence, the $K$-homology element defined by $[M,E,\phi]$ represents a class of D-brane configurations that have the same physical charge. | interpretation 0.84 | 0.59 | 0.38 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | Furthermore, the $K$-cycle representation of D-branes resembles the modern way of characterizing fundamental strings, in which the strings are represented as two-dimensional surfaces with maps into the spacetime manifold. | interpretation 0.90 | 0.29 | 0.06 | asserted 0.92 |
| s5 | This classification of D-branes also suggests the possibility of physically interpreting D-branes wrapping singular subspaces of spacetime, enlarging the known types of singularities that string theory can cope with. | interpretation 0.97 | 0.37 | 0.20 | hedged possibility 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
In this thesis the close relationship between the topological $K$-homology group of the spacetime manifold $X$ of string theory and D-branes in string theory is examined. An element of the $K$-homology group is given by an equivalence class of $K$-cycles $[M,E,\phi]$, where $M$ is a closed spin$^c$ manifold, $E$ is a complex vector bundle over $M$, and $\phi: M\rightarrow X$ is a continuous map. It is proposed that a $K$-cycle $[M,E,\phi]$ represents a D-brane configuration wrapping the subspace $\phi(M)$. As a consequence, the $K$-homology element defined by $[M,E,\phi]$ represents a class of D-brane configurations that have the same physical charge. Furthermore, the $K$-cycle representation of D-branes resembles the modern way of characterizing fundamental strings, in which the strings are represented as two-dimensional surfaces with maps into the spacetime manifold. This classification of D-branes also suggests the possibility of physically interpreting D-branes wrapping singular subspaces of spacetime, enlarging the known types of singularities that string theory can cope with.
Human review
How the literature uses it
2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences
Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
The branes usually taken into account are sheaves defined by sections of vector bundles on $X$ or vector bundles defined on subspaces of $X$, as the ones that arise from the $K$-homology of $X$ [ref] .
Cohomological vertex operators · Final remarks. · 0.85
What it cites · 10 sentences without a confident label
Cites as support 2 papers
-
First of all, anomalies prevent D-branes from wrapping submanifolds whose normal bundles are not spin$^c$ [ref] , justifying our assumption.
Baryons And Branes In Anti de Sitter Space · D-brane Charges · 0.99
-
First of all, anomalies prevent D-branes from wrapping submanifolds whose normal bundles are not spin$^c$ [ref] , justifying our assumption.
Anomalies in String Theory with D-Branes · D-brane Charges · 0.99
Cites as background 6 papers
-
The relationship between D-branes and $K$-homology has been explored previously [ref] .
Noncommutative Tachyons and K-Theory · $K$-homology · 0.89
-
The relationship between D-branes and $K$-homology has been explored previously [ref] .
Superconnections, Anomalies and Non-BPS Brane Charges · $K$-homology · 0.89
-
The relationship between D-branes and $K$-homology has been explored previously [ref] .
D-branes, Matrix Theory and K-homology · $K$-homology · 0.89
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.