REVIEW
Anomalies in String Theory with D-Branes
High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 26 Jul 1999 · 6 references
Pith's verdict: A genuine perturbative derivation of the Spin-c condition on D-branes, with one acknowledged geometric gap that matters less than it looks because the relevant connection is flat.
T0 · AI review
Why Pith says this
Highlight any text to comment on it.
Referee report
The paper
The paper claims
A hidden minus sign forces D-branes to be Spin-c
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing device is a doubling trick. The Dirac operator on a surface with boundary and the local boundary conditions (5.3) — which mix right- and left-handed spinors and flip the sign on the normal-bundle part — is identified with a chiral Dirac operator on the closed double surface, with the sign encoded in a real line bundle $2$ supported in a collar. That identification turns an index problem with boundary into a closed-manifold problem, where the determinant-line-bundle machinery applies: the curvature formula, the holonomy as an adiabatic limit of the exponentiated $2$-invariant, and the Atiyah-Patodi-Singer flat index theorem. The difference between the two boundary conditions is then computed by the Agranovič-Dynin formula as the index of a family of Dirac operators on the boundary circle, which reduces to the standard statement that the pfaffian line bundle of a family of spin circles coupled to a real bundle $F'$ is the pullback of $w_2(F')$.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central result, Theorem 5.6, is that the canonical connection on the pfaffian line bundle of the open-string Dirac operator is flat, and that its holonomy around a family of worldsheets fibered over a circle is $(-1)^{(C,w_2(Q))}$, where $Q$ is the D-brane worldvolume and the pairing is over $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s boundary torus $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s boundary torus $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s boundary torus $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s boundary torus $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s $W = (1.2)$'s boundary torus $W = (1.2)$'s boundary torus, that is, the integral of $w_2(Q)$ over $W = (1.2)$'s boundary torus. Equivalently (Theorem 5.5), the line bundle is the complexification of a real line bundle whose class in $H^1(Z;Z/2)$ is the pushforward of $w_2(2)$, and the topological class of the complex line bundle is the pushforward of $W_3(2)$.
Load-bearing premise
The anomaly is computed for a Dirac operator on the doubled surface, and the metric and connection on the physical boundary-value problem are defined by declaring them to come from that double; the paper states in section 6 that the geometric index theory for local boundary conditions is only outlined and the details are not carried through.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- A D-brane can wrap $Q$ only if $W_3(2)=0$, so $Q$ must be Spin$^c$; the paper's own example $Q=\mathbb{CP}^2$ is allowed but requires half-integral flux, while the non-Spin$^c$ five-manifold built as a $\mathbb{CP}^2$ bundle over $S^1$ with conjugation monodromy is excluded even though it embeds in $\mathbb{R}^{10}$.
- With a topologically nontrivial $B$-field the condition becomes $\zeta|_Q = W_3(\nu)$, where $\zeta\in H^3(Y;\mathbb{Z})$ is the characteristic class of $B$, so the allowed branes are exactly those whose normal bundles have Thom classes in the appropriate twisted K-group.
- The D0-brane charge of a brane wrapping $Q_0$, naively $\int_{Q_0}\hat A(Q_0)\exp(c_1(L))$, is an integer automatically, because with $L$ read as a Spin$^c$ line bundle the integral is the index of a Dirac operator; for $\mathbb{CP}^2$ with trivial $L$ the naive value $\pm 1/8$ is avoided without postulating new conservation laws.
- For closed worldsheets the anomaly cancels whenever $Y$ is spin of dimension ten, and for $Y=\mathbb{R}^{10}$ it cancels separately for left- and right-movers, so the whole obstruction is localized at the boundary of the worldsheet.
- The product of the Levi-Civita holonomy in the spin representation with the $A$-field holonomy, $\mathrm{Tr}\,P\exp(\oint\omega)\cdot\exp(i\oint A)$, is globally well defined even though neither factor is, which is exactly the statement that the brane carries a Spin$^c$ structure built from the metric and $A$.
Reading between the lines
- The argument is a clean template for other boundary conditions: any brane whose worldvolume fermions see a sign ambiguity in a real bundle should be re-read as a twisted (Spin$^c$-like) object, and the same doubling computation should produce the relevant characteristic class without any input from the closed-string sector.
- Because the anomaly is a flat $±1$ holonomy rather than a curvature, the condition is invisible to any local differential-geometric check of the low-energy effective action; one should expect the same to be true for the analogous conditions in M-theory and for orientifold and Type I settings the paper explicitly sets aside.
- The paper's heuristic section suggests that the result could also be reached by imagining a 9-$ar 9$ pair and quantizing 9-$p$ strings; that route depends on assuming brane-antibrane pairs can be created, so the anomaly computation is the conservative version of the same statement, and the two should agree wherever both apply.
- The demand that the pfaffian bundle be flat with holonomy in $±1$ is a stronger statement than the topological condition $W_3(\nu)=0$; a brane could pass the K-theory test and still fail the geometric one, so the paper's footnote that the topological class may vanish while the holonomy does not is worth pursuing as a separate constraint.
Original abstract
We analyze global anomalies for elementary Type II strings in the presence of D-branes. Global anomaly cancellation gives a restriction on the D-brane topology. This restriction makes possible the interpretation of D-brane charge as an element of K-theory.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We analyze global anomalies for elementary Type II strings in the presence of D-branes. Global anomaly cancellation gives a restriction on the D-brane topology. This restriction makes possible the interpretation of D-brane charge as an element of K-theory.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We analyze global anomalies for elementary Type II strings in the presence of D-branes. | contribution 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.06 | asserted 0.91 |
| s1 | Global anomaly cancellation gives a restriction on the D-brane topology. | result 0.99 | 0.70 | 0.37 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | This restriction makes possible the interpretation of D-brane charge as an element of K-theory. | interpretation 0.99 | 0.62 | 0.56 | hedged possibility 0.59 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
Figures
Figures reproduced from arXiv:hep-th/9907189 by the authors.
References
How later papers used it
204 later papers cite it
3 later papers by other authors are listed below: 2 built on it and 1 cited it as support.
Builds on it 2 of 6 papers with this label
-
Said that the spin^c condition on the bundle ν is the appropriate generalization of this paper's Freed-Witten anomaly cancellation condition to this situation.
Ramond-Ramond Fields, Fractional Branes and Orbifold Differential K-Theory (2007) · 0.99 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
-
Used KK-theory's noncommutative version of K-orientation, which generalizes this paper's Freed-Witten anomaly cancellation condition, to select consistent sets of D-branes from its category.
D-branes and bivariant K-theory (2008) · 0.88 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
Cites it as support 1 of 7 papers with this label
-
Said that if the D7 stack wraps a non-spin manifold, this gauge field is already sufficient to make the path integral measure of open strings attached to the D7 stack well-defined, citing this paper.
On Flux Quantization in F-Theory (2010) · 0.96 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
How the literature uses it
205 arXiv papers cite this in 306 sentences
Papers citing it · 244 sentences without a confident label
Builds on it 6 papers
-
This is the orbifold generalization of the Freed-Witten condition [ref] formulated in terms of obstruction classes in Bredon cohomology.
Ramond-Ramond Fields, Fractional Branes and Orbifold Differential K-Theory · Consistency conditions · 0.99
-
KK-theory also provides us with a noncommutative version of K-orientation, which generalizes the Freed-Witten anomaly cancellation condition [ref] and enables us to select the consistent sets of D-branes from our category.
D-branes and bivariant K-theory · Introduction · 0.88
-
This extends the observation in [ref] , where it was shown that, for smooth target spaces, the existence of a spin structure implies the absence of global gauge anomalies.
What makes spacetime spin in string theory? · Introduction · 0.99
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
-
Although it may not be evident reading this work, we used Freed-Witten anomaly as a “guide” (see [ref] , [ref] ).
Topics on topology and superstring theory · Introduction · 0.91
Compares with it 6 papers
-
This may be thought of as mod 3 analog in M-theory of the mod 2 expression in type II string theory, namely the Freed-Witten anomaly cancelation formula for D-branes [ref] $(Sq^3 + H_3∪)F=0$, since the class $Θ$ measures the anomaly of the M-branes [ref] .
An approach to anomalies in M-theory via KSpin · The Degree eight `dual' field $Θ$ · 0.94
-
Then a K-orientation for $f$ is given by [equation] In this way our notion of K-orientation coincides with the Freed-Witten anomaly cancellation condition [ref] .
D-branes and bivariant K-theory · K-orientation and Gysin homomorphisms · 0.81
-
This can be compared with the Freed-Witten anomaly-free condition [ref] for untwisted open strings, which involves the $w_2$ of the normal bundle of the world-volume.
Non-orientable surfaces and electric-magnetic duality · Dimensional reduction from an orientable $4$-manifold · 0.98
Cites it as support 4 papers
-
If the D7 stack wraps a non-spin manifold, this gauge field is already sufficient to make the path integral measure of open strings attached to the D7 stack well-defined [ref] .
On Flux Quantization in F-Theory · Sp(N) singularities · 0.96
-
Before we proceed let us briefly note that the Freed-Witten anomaly [ref] actually rules out cohomologically non-trivial 4-form flux $ι^* G_4 ≠0$ on free M5-instantons (with $G_4 = d C_3$).
Fluxed M5-instantons in F-theory · The partition function of vertical M5-brane instantons · 0.96
-
First of all, anomalies prevent D-branes from wrapping submanifolds whose normal bundles are not spin$^c$ [ref] , justifying our assumption.
D-branes and $K$-homology · D-brane Charges · 0.99
Cites it as background 38 papers
-
These problems have already been analyzed in the literature, starting from the seminal paper of D.Freed and E.Witten [ref] .
Classifying A-field and B-field configurations in the presence of D-branes · Introduction · 0.98
-
In this paper we will address the the quantization rule for the M-theory $G_4$ flux [ref] in its relation to the Freed-Witten quantization condition for gauge fluxes on 7-brane configurations [ref] .
On Flux Quantization in F-Theory II: Unitary and Symplectic Gauge Groups · Introduction · 0.87
-
We recall that, for a single D-brane, the world-sheet path-integral measure contains the terms [ref] : [equation] where $Σ$ is the world-sheet, $ϕ$ is the trajectory of the world-sheet in the space-time, $D_ϕ$ is the pfaffian of the Dirac operator on the world-sheet, coupled to the space-time via $ϕ$, and $A$ and $B$ are the $A$-field and the $B$-field.
Freed-Witten anomaly and D-brane gauge theories · Single D-brane · 0.81
Discussion
Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.