RECORD
S-duality and the N=2 Lens Space Index
High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 6 Jun 2013
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The S-duality properties of these theories highly constrain the lens space indices, and imply in particular that they are naturally acted upon by a set of commuting difference operators corresponding to surface defects.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We discuss some of the analytic properties of lens space indices for 4d N=2 theories of class S. The S-duality properties of these theories highly constrain the lens space indices, and imply in particular that they are naturally acted upon by a set of commuting difference operators corresponding to surface defects. We explicitly identify the difference operators to be a matrix-valued generalization of the elliptic Ruijsenaars-Schneider model. In a special limit these difference operators can be expressed naturally in terms of Cherednik operators appearing in the double affine Hecke algebras, with the eigenfunctions given by non-symmetric Macdonald polynomials.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We discuss some of the analytic properties of lens space indices for 4d N=2 theories of class S. | contribution 0.85 | 0.67 | 0.07 | asserted 0.73 |
| s1 | The S-duality properties of these theories highly constrain the lens space indices, and imply in particular that they are naturally acted upon by a set of commuting difference operators corresponding to surface defects. | result 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.40 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | We explicitly identify the difference operators to be a matrix-valued generalization of the elliptic Ruijsenaars-Schneider model. | result 0.53 | 0.91 | 0.32 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | In a special limit these difference operators can be expressed naturally in terms of Cherednik operators appearing in the double affine Hecke algebras, with the eigenfunctions given by non-symmetric Macdonald polynomials. | result 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.18 | asserted 0.90 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We discuss some of the analytic properties of lens space indices for 4d N=2 theories of class S. The S-duality properties of these theories highly constrain the lens space indices, and imply in particular that they are naturally acted upon by a set of commuting difference operators corresponding to surface defects. We explicitly identify the difference operators to be a matrix-valued generalization of the elliptic Ruijsenaars-Schneider model. In a special limit these difference operators can be expressed naturally in terms of Cherednik operators appearing in the double affine Hecke algebras, with the eigenfunctions given by non-symmetric Macdonald polynomials.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
37 arXiv papers cite this in 43 sentences
Papers citing it · 27 sentences without a confident label
Uses its method or tool 2 papers
-
Using the formula [ref], the single letter contributions from each field to the index [ref], and the projection condition [ref], the contributions to the Casimir energy were computed in [ref] , and the results are [equation] where $[x]_k$ means $xk$, $𝐬=(±1,±1,±1)$ is a vector of possible weights of the trifundamental fields, and the formula for $I_0^H$ contains a sum over all $8$ possibilities for $𝐬$.
Ground States of Class S Theory on ADE Singularities and dual Chern-Simons theory · Counting holonomy sectors for the Lens space · 0.96
-
We take the same approach, as one takes when computing, e.g. the supersymmetric Lens space $L(1,r)×𝕊^1$ indices [ref] .
Instanton counting in Class $\mathcal{S}_k$ · Orbifolding to 4d $=2$/$=1$ circular/toroidal quivers · 1.00
Compares with it 2 papers
-
We thus see that the $1$-cocycle condition leads to a concrete formula for the lens index in terms of the superconformal and $S^2×T^2$ indices, apparently avoiding difficulties with a direct definition of the lens index for $q>1$.[See a Appendix [ref] for a direct definition when $q=1$ and also [ref] .] We also note that the formula is structurally similar to a proposed formula for the $L(p,q)$ partition function of three-dimensional $𝒩=2$ theories [ref] .
Modular factorization of superconformal indices · A general formula · 0.91
-
Our definition of the supersymmetric Casimir energy follows that of [ref] and [ref] but not that of [ref] .
Exact Degeneracy of Casimir Energy for $\mathcal{N}=4$ Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory on ADE Singularities and S-Duality · Introduction · 0.82
Cites it as background 12 papers
-
In this appendix, we collect the known contour integral formulae for the superconformal index $ℐ_(1,0)(ρ̂)$ [ref] , the lens space index $ℐ_(p,1)(ρ̂)$ [ref] and the $S^2×T^2$ index $ℐ_(0,-1)(ρ̂)$ [ref] of general $𝒩=1$ gauge theories.
Modular factorization of superconformal indices · Lens indices for general gauge theories · 0.83
-
and it is already very reminiscent of the setting of Lens space superconformal indices of class $$ theories [ref] : L(k,1)×S^1 × Σ ∩ L(k,1)×S^1 × T^* Σ × ^3 ↻ ↻ ↻ SO(4)_E U(1)_N SU(2)_R .
Equivariant Verlinde algebra from superconformal index and Argyres-Seiberg duality · Introduction · 0.91
-
In this Appendix, we carefully define the $=2$ superconformal lens index [ref] (see also [ref] ).
Four-dimensional Lens Space Index from Two-dimensional Chiral Algebra · Definition and review of the lens index · 0.93
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.