Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The AdS3 x S3 x S3 x S1 Hernandez-Lopez Phases: a Semiclassical Derivation

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 21 Jun 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim As a result we see agreement with the recently calculated all-loop dressing phase in the AdS3 x S3 x T4 case, and exactly 1/2 this in the general case AdS3 x S3 x S3 x S1 for any \alpha\ and any (light) polarisations.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1306.5106 (version 2)
Pith IDOZ3EYL5U, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationMichael C. Abbott (UCT). "The AdS3 x S3 x S3 x S1 Hernandez-Lopez Phases: a Semiclassical Derivation." arXiv:1306.5106 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/OZ3EYL5U
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,870 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.29 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.95 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This note calculates the Hernandez-Lopez phases for strings in AdS3 x S3 x S3 x S1 by semiclassical methods using the d(2,1;\alpha)^2 algebraic curve. By working at general \alpha\ we include modes absent from previous semiclassical calculations of this phase in AdS3 x S3 x T4, and in particular can study the scattering of particles of different mass. By carefully re-deriving the semiclassical formula we clarify some issues of antisymmetrisation, cutoffs and surface terms which could safely be ignored in AdS5 x S5, and some issues about the terms c_1,s which were absent there. As a result we see agreement with the recently calculated all-loop dressing phase in the AdS3 x S3 x T4 case, and exactly 1/2 this in the general case AdS3 x S3 x S3 x S1 for any \alpha\ and any (light) polarisations.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This note calculates the Hernandez-Lopez phases for strings in AdS3 x S3 x S3 x S1 by semiclassical methods using the d(2,1;\alpha)^2 algebraic curve. contribution 0.99 0.96 0.08 asserted 1.00
s1 By working at general \alpha\ we include modes absent from previous semiclassical calculations of this phase in AdS3 x S3 x T4, and in particular can study the scattering of particles of different mass. contribution 0.85 0.91 0.05 asserted 0.89
s2 By carefully re-deriving the semiclassical formula we clarify some issues of antisymmetrisation, cutoffs and surface terms which could safely be ignored in AdS5 x S5, and some issues about the terms c_1,s which were absent there. contribution 0.63 0.92 0.06 asserted 0.83
s3 As a result we see agreement with the recently calculated all-loop dressing phase in the AdS3 x S3 x T4 case, and exactly 1/2 this in the general case AdS3 x S3 x S3 x S1 for any \alpha\ and any (light) polarisations. result 1.00 0.92 0.87 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This note calculates the Hernandez-Lopez phases for strings in AdS3 x S3 x S3 x S1 by semiclassical methods using the d(2,1;\alpha)^2 algebraic curve. By working at general \alpha\ we include modes absent from previous semiclassical calculations of this phase in AdS3 x S3 x T4, and in particular can study the scattering of particles of different mass. By carefully re-deriving the semiclassical formula we clarify some issues of antisymmetrisation, cutoffs and surface terms which could safely be ignored in AdS5 x S5, and some issues about the terms c_1,s which were absent there. As a result we see agreement with the recently calculated all-loop dressing phase in the AdS3 x S3 x T4 case, and exactly 1/2 this in the general case AdS3 x S3 x S3 x S1 for any \alpha\ and any (light) polarisations.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

21 arXiv papers cite this in 46 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 24 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
Uses its method or tool 2 papers
  • Multiplying by the relevant weight and integrating over the cut, [ref] obtained this expression in terms of resolvents:[We write tildes on quantities defined to match [ref] , which differ from those in the S-matrix and dressing phase papers [ref] by powers of $$.

    Massless L\"uscher Terms and the Limitations of the AdS3 Asymptotic Bethe Ansatz · Bethe Ansatz calculation · 0.91

  • We also observe that truncating the model to just the massive modes breaks the agreement with the HL phase. * We also compute the phase semiclassically, using the coset model and the algebraic curve, following [ref] .

    Scattering in AdS(2)/CFT(1) and the BES Phase · Introduction · 0.82

Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as background 13 papers

What it cites · 96 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
  • To derive ([ref]), Chen, Dorey and Lima Matos [ref] studied a classical scattering state $φ_1,2(x,t)$ of two magnons in a box of size $L$, and calculated $1/L$ corrections to the one-loop energy correction ([ref]).

    Quantum Scattering of Giant Magnons · Deriving the One-Loop Phase · 0.91

  • The integrals we need to do arise from sums over $n$ using the method of [ref] , which uses the poles of $(πn)$ to write a contour integral.

    Exact expressions for quantum corrections to spinning strings · $AdS_3$ Magnon Scattering · 1.00

Uses data or values from 1 paper
  • These were calculated in [ref] for the purpose of finding energy corrections ([ref]), and they are written in terms of the spectral parameter as [equation] These are shown in table [ref]; see appendix [ref] for details.

    Comment on Strings in AdS3 x S3 x S3 x S1 at One Loop · $AdS_3$ Magnon Scattering · 0.97

Compares with 3 papers
Cites as background 40 papers
  • We are mostly concerned with the light modes, $m=cos^2ϕ,sin^2ϕ$, as these are fundamental in the description of [ref] .

    All-loop Bethe ansatz equations for AdS3/CFT2 · Introduction · 0.88

  • We are mostly concerned with the light modes, $m=cos^2ϕ,sin^2ϕ$, as these are fundamental in the description of [ref] .

    A dynamic su(1|1)^2 S-matrix for AdS3/CFT2 · Introduction · 0.88

  • The dressing phase was first introduced by Arutyunov, Frolov and Staudacher (AFS) [ref] for classical strings (large $λ$), and the extension of this to one loop by Hernández and López [ref] (see also [ref] ) was an important step towards the all-$λ$ phase, conventionally $(σ_BES)^2$.

    On Quantum Corrections to Spinning Strings and Bethe Equations · Introduction · 0.96

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.