Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Mass Distribution of Subgiant Planet Hosts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1306.6627 v2 pith:KXUXVCJX submitted 2013-06-27 astro-ph.EP

The Mass Distribution of Subgiant Planet Hosts

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords massdistributionslloydplanetstarsbeenhighsubgiant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

High mass stars are hostile to Doppler measurements due to rotation and activity on the main-sequence, so radial velocity searches for planets around massive stars have relied on evolved stars. A large number of planets have been found around evolved stars with M>1.5 Msun. To test the robustness of mass determinations, Lloyd (2011) compared mass distributions of planet hosting subgiants with distributions from integrating isochrones and concluded it is unlikely the subgiant planet hosts are this massive, but rather the mass inferences are systematically in error. The conclusions of Lloyd (2011) have been called in to question by Johnson, Morton & Wright (2013), who show TRILEGAL-based mass distributions disagree with the mass distributions in Lloyd (2011), which they attribute to Malmquist bias. Johnson, Morton & Wright (2013) argue that the very small spectroscopic observational uncertainties favor high masses, and there are a large number of high mass sub giants in RV surveys. However, in this letter, it is shown that Malmquist bias does not impact the mass distributions, but the mass distribution is sensitive to Galaxy model. The relationship needed to reconcile the subgiant planet host masses with any model of the Galactic stellar population is implausible, and the conclusion of Lloyd (2011) that spectroscopic mass determinations of subgiants are likely to have been overestimated is robust.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Stellar Observations Network Group (SONG) -- A Legacy Archive of Stellar Time-Domain Spectroscopy

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 accept novelty 3.5

    The SONG network archive holds >580,000 spectra of 3091 stars (2014–2025) and is presented as an open community resource for asteroseismology, binaries, variability, and exoplanets.