Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Measuring the charged Higgs mass and distinguishing between models with top-quark observables

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 3 Jul 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We study the process of single-top production in association with a charged Higgs boson at the LHC and discuss how top-quark polarization and an azimuthal asymmetry $A_\varphi$ of the charged lepton from top decay can be used in some extensions of the Standard Model to determine or constrain the charged Higgs boson mass.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.79 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1307.1158 (version 1)
Pith ID3346YIFZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationPankaj Sharma, Rui Santos, Saurabh D. Rindani. "Measuring the charged Higgs mass and distinguishing between models with top-quark observables." arXiv:1307.1158 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/3346YIFZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,350 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.24 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study the process of single-top production in association with a charged Higgs boson at the LHC and discuss how top-quark polarization and an azimuthal asymmetry $A_\varphi$ of the charged lepton from top decay can be used in some extensions of the Standard Model to determine or constrain the charged Higgs boson mass. We also discuss some scenarios where these variables can be used to distinguish between different models.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study the process of single-top production in association with a charged Higgs boson at the LHC and discuss how top-quark polarization and an azimuthal asymmetry $A_\varphi$ of the charged lepton from top decay can be used in some extensions of the Standard Model to determine or constrain the charged Higgs boson mass. contribution 0.99 0.70 0.46 hedged possibility 0.79
s1 We also discuss some scenarios where these variables can be used to distinguish between different models. contribution 0.98 0.59 0.12 asserted 0.49

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.83 · evidence from argument 0.79.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study the process of single-top production in association with a charged Higgs boson at the LHC and discuss how top-quark polarization and an azimuthal asymmetry $A_\varphi$ of the charged lepton from top decay can be used in some extensions of the Standard Model to determine or constrain the charged Higgs boson mass. We also discuss some scenarios where these variables can be used to distinguish between different models.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

9 arXiv papers cite this in 11 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 5 papers

What it cites · 12 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Uses data or values from 2 papers
Compares with 2 papers
Cites as background 9 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.