Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Impact of $Z^{\prime}$ and UED parameters on different asymmetries in $B_{s} \to \phi \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$ decays

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 20 Jul 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Therefore, the measurements of these observables for the same decay would permit the detection of physics beyond the Standard Model and will also help us to distinguish between different new physics scenarios.

how it is stated · asserted 0.52 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1307.5359 (version 1)
Pith IDVNEKTGNP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationIshtiaq Ahmed, M.Ali Paracha, M. Jamil Aslam. "Impact of $Z^{\prime}$ and UED parameters on different asymmetries in $B_{s} \to \phi \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$ decays." arXiv:1307.5359 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/VNEKTGNP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,989 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A comprehensive study of the impact of new-physics on different observables for $B_{s}\to \phi \ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ has been done. We examine the new physics models such as $Z^{\prime}$ and UED models, where the effects of new physics coming through the modification of Wilson coefficients. We have analyzed these effects through the theoretical prediction of the branching ratio, the forward-backward asymmetry, lepton polarization asymmetries and the helicity fractions of the final state meson. These all observables will definitely be measured in present and future colliders with great precision. We also pointed out that hadronic uncertainties in various physical observables are small which make them an ideal probe to establish new physics. Therefore, the measurements of these observables for the same decay would permit the detection of physics beyond the Standard Model and will also help us to distinguish between different new physics scenarios.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A comprehensive study of the impact of new-physics on different observables for $B_{s}\to \phi \ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ has been done. contribution 1.00 0.86 0.07 asserted 1.00
s1 We examine the new physics models such as $Z^{\prime}$ and UED models, where the effects of new physics coming through the modification of Wilson coefficients. contribution 0.54 0.63 0.04 asserted 0.94
s2 We have analyzed these effects through the theoretical prediction of the branching ratio, the forward-backward asymmetry, lepton polarization asymmetries and the helicity fractions of the final state meson. method 0.52 0.91 0.06 asserted 1.00
s3 These all observables will definitely be measured in present and future colliders with great precision. future work 0.45 0.06 0.05 asserted 0.90
s4 We also pointed out that hadronic uncertainties in various physical observables are small which make them an ideal probe to establish new physics. result 0.66 0.64 0.18 asserted 0.99
s5 Therefore, the measurements of these observables for the same decay would permit the detection of physics beyond the Standard Model and will also help us to distinguish between different new physics scenarios. interpretation 0.99 0.27 0.79 asserted 0.52

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.88 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.70.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A comprehensive study of the impact of new-physics on different observables for $B_{s}\to \phi \ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ has been done. We examine the new physics models such as $Z^{\prime}$ and UED models, where the effects of new physics coming through the modification of Wilson coefficients. We have analyzed these effects through the theoretical prediction of the branching ratio, the forward-backward asymmetry, lepton polarization asymmetries and the helicity fractions of the final state meson. These all observables will definitely be measured in present and future colliders with great precision. We also pointed out that hadronic uncertainties in various physical observables are small which make them an ideal probe to establish new physics. Therefore, the measurements of these observables for the same decay would permit the detection of physics beyond the Standard Model and will also help us to distinguish between different new physics scenarios.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 55 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 4 papers
Uses data or values from 1 paper
Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 21 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.