Pith.

High Energy Physics - Lattice · arXiv:1307.6997 v2 · submitted 26 Jul 2013

Running coupling constant and mass anomalous dimension of six-flavor SU(2) gauge theory

M. Hayakawa, K.-I. Ishikawa, S. Takeda, N. Yamada

The paper says

“We find that the running slows down and comes to a stop at 0.06 ≲ 1/g2 ≲ 0.15 where the mass anomalous dimension is estimated to be 0.26 ≲ γ*m ≲ 0.74.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

In the exploration of viable models of dynamical electroweak symmetry breaking, it is essential to locate the lower end of the conformal window and know the mass anomalous dimensions there for a variety of gauge theories. We calculate, with the Schrödinger functional scheme, the running coupling constant and the mass anomalous dimension of SU(2) gauge theory with six massless Dirac fermions in the fundamental representation. The calculations are performed on 64 - 244 lattices over a wide range of lattice bare couplings to take the continuum limit. The discretization errors for both quantities are removed perturbatively. We find that the running slows down and comes to a stop at 0.06 ≲ 1/g2 ≲ 0.15 where the mass anomalous dimension is estimated to be 0.26 ≲ γ*m ≲ 0.74.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.23 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
In the exploration of viable models of dynamical electroweak symmetry breaking, it is essential to locate the lower end of the conformal window and know the mass anomalous dimensions there for a variety of gauge theories. background 0.99 0.04 0.03 asserted 0.98
We calculate, with the Schr\"odinger functional scheme, the running coupling constant and the mass anomalous dimension of SU(2) gauge theory with six massless Dirac fermions in the fundamental representation. contribution 0.99 0.98 0.06 asserted 1.00
The calculations are performed on $6^4$ - $24^4$ lattices over a wide range of lattice bare couplings to take the continuum limit. method 1.00 0.95 0.02 asserted 0.99
The discretization errors for both quantities are removed perturbatively. method 1.00 0.91 0.02 asserted 1.00
We find that the running slows down and comes to a stop at $0.06 \lesssim 1/g^2 \lesssim 0.15$ where the mass anomalous dimension is estimated to be $0.26 \lesssim \gamma^*_m \lesssim 0.74$. result 1.00 0.97 0.92 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,432 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 2 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

12 arXiv papers cite this in 18 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

Papers citing it · 13 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 4 papers

What it cites · 16 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 5 papers
Compares with 3 papers
Cites as support 1 paper
Cites as background 38 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment