Pith. Sign in

RECORD

What do non-relativistic CFTs tell us about Lifshitz spacetimes?

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 26 Aug 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Indeed, for any (planar) spacetime which breaks (d+1)-dimensional Lorentz invariance at any radius, we show that local boundary data cannot reconstruct complete local bulk data.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1308.5689 (version 2)
Pith IDHIKKZ32K, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCynthia Keeler, Gino Knodel, James T. Liu. "What do non-relativistic CFTs tell us about Lifshitz spacetimes?." arXiv:1308.5689 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/HIKKZ32K
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,020 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.43 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.14 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study the reconstructability of (d+2)-dimensional bulk spacetime from (d+1)-dimensional boundary data, particularly concentrating on backgrounds which break (d+1)-dimensional Lorentz invariance. For a large class of such spacetimes, there exist null geodesics which do not reach the boundary. Therefore classically we expect some information is trapped in the bulk and thus invisible at the boundary. We show that this classical intuition correctly predicts the quantum situation: whenever there are null geodesics which do not reach the boundary, there are also "trapped scalar modes" whose boundary imprint is exponentially suppressed. We use these modes to show that no smearing function exists for pure Lifshitz spacetime, nor for any flow which includes a Lifshitz region. Indeed, for any (planar) spacetime which breaks (d+1)-dimensional Lorentz invariance at any radius, we show that local boundary data cannot reconstruct complete local bulk data.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study the reconstructability of (d+2)-dimensional bulk spacetime from (d+1)-dimensional boundary data, particularly concentrating on backgrounds which break (d+1)-dimensional Lorentz invariance. contribution 0.81 0.88 0.05 asserted 0.80
s1 For a large class of such spacetimes, there exist null geodesics which do not reach the boundary. result 0.96 0.62 0.05 asserted 0.95
s2 Therefore classically we expect some information is trapped in the bulk and thus invisible at the boundary. interpretation 0.91 0.20 0.08 hedged possibility 0.88
s3 We show that this classical intuition correctly predicts the quantum situation: whenever there are null geodesics which do not reach the boundary, there are also "trapped scalar modes" whose boundary imprint is exponentially suppressed. result 0.99 0.93 0.32 asserted 1.00
s4 We use these modes to show that no smearing function exists for pure Lifshitz spacetime, nor for any flow which includes a Lifshitz region. result 0.99 0.94 0.36 asserted 1.00
s5 Indeed, for any (planar) spacetime which breaks (d+1)-dimensional Lorentz invariance at any radius, we show that local boundary data cannot reconstruct complete local bulk data. result 0.98 0.93 0.68 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study the reconstructability of (d+2)-dimensional bulk spacetime from (d+1)-dimensional boundary data, particularly concentrating on backgrounds which break (d+1)-dimensional Lorentz invariance. For a large class of such spacetimes, there exist null geodesics which do not reach the boundary. Therefore classically we expect some information is trapped in the bulk and thus invisible at the boundary. We show that this classical intuition correctly predicts the quantum situation: whenever there are null geodesics which do not reach the boundary, there are also "trapped scalar modes" whose boundary imprint is exponentially suppressed. We use these modes to show that no smearing function exists for pure Lifshitz spacetime, nor for any flow which includes a Lifshitz region. Indeed, for any (planar) spacetime which breaks (d+1)-dimensional Lorentz invariance at any radius, we show that local boundary data cannot reconstruct complete local bulk data.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

16 arXiv papers cite this in 33 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 20 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Uses its method or tool 2 papers
  • After switching to the $ρ̂$ coordinates defined in ([ref]), the spectral function can be approximated by [The additional prefactor of $|k⃗|^2νz$ arises from letting $ϵ→|k⃗|^-zϵ$, which is the proper UV cutoff needed to cancel the log-divergence of the integral. ] [ref] [equation] Here $K$ is a normalization constant and [equation] The additional $1/ρ̂^2$ term is equivalent to an effective shift $ν^2→ν^2+1/4$, which is necessary for consistency of the WKB approximation for $1/x^2$ potentials [ref] .

    Universal features of Lifshitz Green's functions from holography · WKB analysis of the spectral function · 0.91

  • The behavior alluded to above can be quantified using a WKB approximation [ref] .

    Spatial Anisotropy in Nonrelativistic Holography · WKB Approximation · 0.97

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • The exponential suppression of spectral weight below the non-relativistic dispersion relation is a universal feature of Lifshitz spacetimes, and furthermore provides an obstruction to the construction of a smearing function for the bulk reconstruction of local boundary operators [ref] .

    Seeing bulk perturbations in Lifshitz holography · Conclusions · 1.00

Cites it as background 7 papers

What it cites · 33 sentences without a confident label

Compares with 3 papers
Cites as support 1 paper
  • It is, however, felt by strings that fall towards the horizon [ref] .]

    Lifshitz Singularities · No smearing function $⇔$ singularities? · 0.97

Cites as background 29 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.