Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to $HZW^{\pm}$ production at 14 TeV LHC

Bingfang Yang; Jie Ren; Ning Liu

RECORD

Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to $HZW^{\pm}$ production at 14 TeV LHC

Ning Liu, Jie Ren, Bingfang Yang

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 23 Oct 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our results show that the NLO QCD correction can enhance the leading-order cross section of $pp \to HZW^{\pm}$ by 45%, when $ m_H $ = 125.3 GeV.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID1310.6192 (version 3)

Pith IDNWP6DIWA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationBingfang Yang, Jie Ren, Ning Liu. "Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to $HZW^{\pm}$ production at 14 TeV LHC." arXiv:1310.6192 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/NWP6DIWA

Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,882 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.23 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.57 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Since the precise study of Higgs gauge couplings is important to test the Standard Model (SM), we calculate the complete next-to-leading order QCD(NLO QCD) correction to the $pp \to HZW^{\pm}$ production in the SM at 14 TeV LHC. Our results show that the NLO QCD correction can enhance the leading-order cross section of $pp \to HZW^{\pm}$ by 45%, when $ m_H $ = 125.3 GeV. We also study the dependence of the LO and NLO corrected cross sections on the renormalization and factorization scale $\mu$. Besides, due to the unbalance of parton distribution functions, we investigate the charge asymmetry of $W^{\pm}$ in the production of $pp\to HZW^{\pm}$, which can reach 32.94% for $\mu=(m_H+m_Z+m_W)/2$ at 14 TeV LHC.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Since the precise study of Higgs gauge couplings is important to test the Standard Model (SM), we calculate the complete next-to-leading order QCD(NLO QCD) correction to the $pp \to HZW^{\pm}$ production in the SM at 14 TeV LHC.	contribution 0.98	0.94	0.10	asserted 0.98
s1	Our results show that the NLO QCD correction can enhance the leading-order cross section of $pp \to HZW^{\pm}$ by 45%, when $ m_H $ = 125.3 GeV.	result 1.00	0.96	0.64	asserted 1.00
s2	We also study the dependence of the LO and NLO corrected cross sections on the renormalization and factorization scale $\mu$.	contribution 0.93	0.94	0.04	asserted 0.88
s3	Besides, due to the unbalance of parton distribution functions, we investigate the charge asymmetry of $W^{\pm}$ in the production of $pp\to HZW^{\pm}$, which can reach 32.94% for $\mu=(m_H+m_Z+m_W)/2$ at 14 TeV LHC.	result 0.87	0.94	0.09	asserted 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.92 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v3

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper

Original abstract

Since the precise study of Higgs gauge couplings is important to test the Standard Model (SM), we calculate the complete next-to-leading order QCD(NLO QCD) correction to the $pp \to HZW^{\pm}$ production in the SM at 14 TeV LHC. Our results show that the NLO QCD correction can enhance the leading-order cross section of $pp \to HZW^{\pm}$ by 45%, when $ m_H $ = 125.3 GeV. We also study the dependence of the LO and NLO corrected cross sections on the renormalization and factorization scale $\mu$. Besides, due to the unbalance of parton distribution functions, we investigate the charge asymmetry of $W^{\pm}$ in the production of $pp\to HZW^{\pm}$, which can reach 32.94% for $\mu=(m_H+m_Z+m_W)/2$ at 14 TeV LHC.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References

How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 8 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 2 papers

Finally, the total NLO EW correction of the process $e^+e^- →HZγ$ is obtained by [equation] We do the calculations by using the packages FeynArts-3.8 [ref] , FormCalc-8.2 [ref] and LoopTools-2.8 [ref] (we have the experience for using such packages [ref] ).

Full one-loop electroweak corrections to $e^+e^- \to ZH\gamma$ at a Higgs factory · A description of analytical calculations · 1.00
The infrared (IR) divergences can appear in the virtual correction of $e^+e^- →hZ$, which is removed with the two cutoff phase space slicing method [ref] used in our previous works [ref] .

Implications of CP-violating Top-Higgs Couplings at LHC and Higgs Factories · collider implications · 1.00

Compares with it 1 paper

They lead to an increase of the $HW^±Z$ cross sections by $∼+43%$ at LHC energies and $∼+55%$ at the FCC-hh at 100 TeV, similar to what has been observed earlier in the literature in the case of the LHC, albeit with a different central scale choice of $μ_0 = 1/2 (M_W + M_Z + M_H)$ [ref] .

Next-To-Leading Order QCD Corrections to Associated Production of a SM Higgs Boson with a Pair of Weak Bosons in the POWHEG-BOX · Setup of The Calculation · 0.83

Cites it as background 2 papers

The next-to-leading order (NLO) QCD corrections to various $H+VV'$ processes at the LHC have now been calculated: $HW^+_ W^-_$ production [ref] , $HW^±_ Z$ production [ref] , associated production with a massive gauge boson $W/Z$ and a photon [ref] , and finally $HZZ$ production [ref] .

Gluon fusion and $b\bar{b}$ corrections to $H W^+ W^- / H Z Z$ production in the POWHEG-BOX · Introduction · 0.96
In the past few years the calculation of the next-to-leading order (NLO) QCD corrections to various SM $H+VV'$ processes at the LHC have been completed: $HW^+ W^-$ production [ref] , $HW^±Z$ production [ref] and the associated production with a massive gauge boson $W/Z$ and a photon [ref] .

Next-To-Leading Order QCD Corrections to Associated Production of a SM Higgs Boson with a Pair of Weak Bosons in the POWHEG-BOX · INTRODUCTION · 0.84

What it cites · 3 sentences without a confident label

Uses data or values from 2 papers

The SM parameters used in our numerical calculation are [ref] : [equation] besides, the CKM matrix elements are taken as [equation] The Higgs mass is taken as $m_H = 125.3$ GeV from the combined results of ATLAS and CMS in Ref. [ref] .

The universal Higgs fit · Numerical result and discussion · 1.00
In the calculations, we use the branching ratios of $Br(H →bb̅)=57.8%$ [ref] and $Br(W^+ →μ^+ν_μ)=10.57%$ [ref] .

Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Inclusive Observables · Numerical result and discussion · 0.99

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.