Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Validity of the two-band model of bilayer and trilayer graphene in a magnetic field

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics · Submitted 28 Oct 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our numerical analysis shows that the 2BM is a good approximation for bilayer graphene in a wide range of magnetic field and bias but mostly for Landau level $M=0.$ The applicability of the 2BM in trilayer graphene, even for level $M=0,$ is much more restricted.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1310.7551 (version 1)
Pith IDTWS5FOHZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationManuel Barrette, R. C\^ot\'e. "Validity of the two-band model of bilayer and trilayer graphene in a magnetic field." arXiv:1310.7551 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/TWS5FOHZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,735 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.68 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.35 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.19 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The eigenstates of an electron in the chiral two-dimensional electron gas (C2DEG) formed in an AB-stacked bilayer or an ABC-stacked trilayer graphene is a spinor with $4$ or $6$ components respectively. These components give the amplitude of the wave function on the $4$ or $6$ carbon sites in the unit cell of the lattice. In the tight-binding approximation, the eigenenergies are thus found by diagonalizing a $4\times 4$ or a $6\times 6$ matrix. In the continuum approximation where the electron wave vector $% k<<1/a_{0},$ with $a_{0}$ the lattice constant of the graphene sheets, a common approximation is the two-band model\cite{McCann2006} (2BM)\ where the eigenstates for the bilayer and trilayer systems are described by a two-component spinor that gives the amplitude of the wave function on the two sites with low-energy $\left\vert E\right\vert <<\gamma_{1}$ where $% \gamma_{1}$ is the hopping energy between sites that are directly above one another in adjacent layers. The 2BM has been used extensively to study the phase diagram of the C2DEG in a magnetic field as well as its transport and optical properties. In this paper, we use a numerical approach to compute the eigenstates and Landau level energies of the full tight-binding model in the continuum approximation and compare them with the prediction of the 2BM when the magnetic field or an electrical bias between the outermost layers is varied. Our numerical analysis shows that the 2BM is a good approximation for bilayer graphene in a wide range of magnetic field and bias but mostly for Landau level $M=0.$ The applicability of the 2BM in trilayer graphene, even for level $M=0,$ is much more restricted. In this case, the 2BM\ fails to reproduce some of the level crossings that occur between the sub-levels of $M=0.$

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The eigenstates of an electron in the chiral two-dimensional electron gas (C2DEG) formed in an AB-stacked bilayer or an ABC-stacked trilayer graphene is a spinor with $4$ or $6$ components respectively. background 1.00 0.07 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 These components give the amplitude of the wave function on the $4$ or $6$ carbon sites in the unit cell of the lattice. background 1.00 0.06 0.01 asserted 1.00
s2 In the tight-binding approximation, the eigenenergies are thus found by diagonalizing a $4\times 4$ or a $6\times 6$ matrix. background 0.98 0.09 0.01 asserted 1.00
s3 In the continuum approximation where the electron wave vector $% k<<1/a_{0},$ with $a_{0}$ the lattice constant of the graphene sheets, a common approximation is the two-band model\cite{McCann2006} (2BM)\ where the eigenstates for the bilayer and trilayer systems are described by a two-component spinor that gives the amplitude of the wave function on the two sites with low-energy $\left\vert E\right\vert <<\gamma_{1}$ where $% \gamma_{1}$ is the hopping energy between sites that are directly above one another in adjacent layers. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 0.95
s4 The 2BM has been used extensively to study the phase diagram of the C2DEG in a magnetic field as well as its transport and optical properties. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s5 In this paper, we use a numerical approach to compute the eigenstates and Landau level energies of the full tight-binding model in the continuum approximation and compare them with the prediction of the 2BM when the magnetic field or an electrical bias between the outermost layers is varied. method 0.66 0.95 0.05 asserted 0.93
s6 Our numerical analysis shows that the 2BM is a good approximation for bilayer graphene in a wide range of magnetic field and bias but mostly for Landau level $M=0.$ The applicability of the 2BM in trilayer graphene, even for level $M=0,$ is much more restricted. result 1.00 0.97 0.92 asserted 1.00
s7 In this case, the 2BM\ fails to reproduce some of the level crossings that occur between the sub-levels of $M=0.$ result 0.94 0.87 0.13 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The eigenstates of an electron in the chiral two-dimensional electron gas (C2DEG) formed in an AB-stacked bilayer or an ABC-stacked trilayer graphene is a spinor with $4$ or $6$ components respectively. These components give the amplitude of the wave function on the $4$ or $6$ carbon sites in the unit cell of the lattice. In the tight-binding approximation, the eigenenergies are thus found by diagonalizing a $4\times 4$ or a $6\times 6$ matrix. In the continuum approximation where the electron wave vector $% k<<1/a_{0},$ with $a_{0}$ the lattice constant of the graphene sheets, a common approximation is the two-band model\cite{McCann2006} (2BM)\ where the eigenstates for the bilayer and trilayer systems are described by a two-component spinor that gives the amplitude of the wave function on the two sites with low-energy $\left\vert E\right\vert <<\gamma_{1}$ where $% \gamma_{1}$ is the hopping energy between sites that are directly above one another in adjacent layers. The 2BM has been used extensively to study the phase diagram of the C2DEG in a magnetic field as well as its transport and optical properties. In this paper, we use a numerical approach to compute the eigenstates and Landau level energies of the full tight-binding model in the continuum approximation and compare them with the prediction of the 2BM when the magnetic field or an electrical bias between the outermost layers is varied. Our numerical analysis shows that the 2BM is a good approximation for bilayer graphene in a wide range of magnetic field and bias but mostly for Landau level $M=0.$ The applicability of the 2BM in trilayer graphene, even for level $M=0,$ is much more restricted. In this case, the 2BM\ fails to reproduce some of the level crossings that occur between the sub-levels of $M=0.$

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.