Pith. Sign in

RECORD

SO(10) GUTs with large tensor representations on Noncommutative Space-time

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 12 Nov 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The existence of these interactions helps to clearly distinguish noncommutative Minkowski space-time from ordinary Minkowski space-time.

how it is stated · asserted 0.91 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1311.2826 (version 1)
Pith IDYLPNGY4F, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC.P. Martin (Universidad Complutense de Madrid). "SO(10) GUTs with large tensor representations on Noncommutative Space-time." arXiv:1311.2826 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/YLPNGY4F
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,597 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.13 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.79 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We construct a noncommutative version of a general renormalizable SO(10) GUT with Higgses in the 210, $\overline{126}, 45, 10$ and 120 irreps of SO(10) and a Peccei-Quinn symmetry. Thus, we formulate the noncommutative counterpart of a non-supersymmetric SO(10) GUT which has recently been shown to be consistent with all the physics below $M_{GUT}$. The simplicity of our construction --the simplicity of the Yukawa terms, in particular-- stems from the fact that the Higgses of our GUT can be viewed as elements of the Clifford algebra $\mathbb{C}\rm{l}_{10}(\mathbb{C})$; elements on which the SO(10) gauge transformations act by conjugation. The noncommutative GUT we build contains tree-level interactions among different Higgs species that are absent in their ordinary counterpart as they are forbidden by SO(10) and Lorentz invariance. The existence of these interactions helps to clearly distinguish noncommutative Minkowski space-time from ordinary Minkowski space-time.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We construct a noncommutative version of a general renormalizable SO(10) GUT with Higgses in the 210, $\overline{126}, 45, 10$ and 120 irreps of SO(10) and a Peccei-Quinn symmetry. contribution 1.00 0.95 0.19 asserted 1.00
s1 Thus, we formulate the noncommutative counterpart of a non-supersymmetric SO(10) GUT which has recently been shown to be consistent with all the physics below $M_{GUT}$. contribution 0.63 0.64 0.16 asserted 0.94
s2 The simplicity of our construction --the simplicity of the Yukawa terms, in particular-- stems from the fact that the Higgses of our GUT can be viewed as elements of the Clifford algebra $\mathbb{C}\rm{l}_{10}(\mathbb{C})$; elements on which the SO(10) gauge transformations act by conjugation. method 0.73 0.75 0.11 asserted 1.00
s3 The noncommutative GUT we build contains tree-level interactions among different Higgs species that are absent in their ordinary counterpart as they are forbidden by SO(10) and Lorentz invariance. result 0.94 0.86 0.29 asserted 1.00
s4 The existence of these interactions helps to clearly distinguish noncommutative Minkowski space-time from ordinary Minkowski space-time. interpretation 0.96 0.70 0.29 asserted 0.91

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We construct a noncommutative version of a general renormalizable SO(10) GUT with Higgses in the 210, $\overline{126}, 45, 10$ and 120 irreps of SO(10) and a Peccei-Quinn symmetry. Thus, we formulate the noncommutative counterpart of a non-supersymmetric SO(10) GUT which has recently been shown to be consistent with all the physics below $M_{GUT}$. The simplicity of our construction --the simplicity of the Yukawa terms, in particular-- stems from the fact that the Higgses of our GUT can be viewed as elements of the Clifford algebra $\mathbb{C}\rm{l}_{10}(\mathbb{C})$; elements on which the SO(10) gauge transformations act by conjugation. The noncommutative GUT we build contains tree-level interactions among different Higgs species that are absent in their ordinary counterpart as they are forbidden by SO(10) and Lorentz invariance. The existence of these interactions helps to clearly distinguish noncommutative Minkowski space-time from ordinary Minkowski space-time.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 21 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 2 papers
Uses the method or tool of 6 papers
Cites as support 1 paper
Cites as background 31 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.