Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Quantization and fixed points of non-integrable Weyl theory

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 30 Dec 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We discuss the fixed points of these flows.

how it is stated · asserted 0.51 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1312.7767 (version 1)
Pith IDNHQMV2XT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCarlo Pagani, Roberto Percacci. "Quantization and fixed points of non-integrable Weyl theory." arXiv:1312.7767 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/NHQMV2XT
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,185 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.36 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.04 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider a simple but generic model of gravity where Weyl--invariance is realized thanks to the presence of a gauge field for dilatations. We quantize the theory by suitably defining renormalization group flows that describe the integration of successive momentum shells, in such a way that Weyl--invariance is maintained in the flow. When the gauge fields are massless the theory has, in addition to Weyl invariance, an abelian gauge symmetry. According to the definition of the cutoff, the flow can break or preserve this extended symmetry. We discuss the fixed points of these flows.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider a simple but generic model of gravity where Weyl--invariance is realized thanks to the presence of a gauge field for dilatations. contribution 0.49 0.55 0.04 asserted 0.99
s1 We quantize the theory by suitably defining renormalization group flows that describe the integration of successive momentum shells, in such a way that Weyl--invariance is maintained in the flow. method 0.98 0.93 0.09 asserted 1.00
s2 When the gauge fields are massless the theory has, in addition to Weyl invariance, an abelian gauge symmetry. result 0.67 0.46 0.06 asserted 1.00
s3 According to the definition of the cutoff, the flow can break or preserve this extended symmetry. result 0.33 0.31 0.09 hedged possibility 0.73
s4 We discuss the fixed points of these flows. contribution 0.99 0.87 0.10 asserted 0.51

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.95 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider a simple but generic model of gravity where Weyl--invariance is realized thanks to the presence of a gauge field for dilatations. We quantize the theory by suitably defining renormalization group flows that describe the integration of successive momentum shells, in such a way that Weyl--invariance is maintained in the flow. When the gauge fields are massless the theory has, in addition to Weyl invariance, an abelian gauge symmetry. According to the definition of the cutoff, the flow can break or preserve this extended symmetry. We discuss the fixed points of these flows.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

7 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 4 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • In this section we quantize the theory in exactly the same way carried out by Fradkin and Tsytlin in [ref] (see also [ref] ) for the local theory ([ref])[ In this subsection we define $g_μν ≡ϕ^2 ĝ_μν$, which slightly differs from ([ref]) because $[ϕ] = 0$ and in particular its exponent is here independent on the spacetime dimension $D$.

    Finite Conformal Quantum Gravity and Nonsingular Spacetimes · Conformal quantum gravity in $D=4$ · 0.93

Cites it as background 2 papers
  • The way to preserve background Weyl invariance in the quantum theory has been discussed in [ref] .

    Split Weyl transformations in quantum gravity · Weyl calculus · 0.96

  • Furthermore, many conceptual questions related to Asymptotic Safety have been addressed in [ref] .] Whether such a fixed point exists beyond finite-dimensional truncations and persists in a Lorentzian setting remains an open challenging problem [ref] , even though the first steps taken in [ref] and [ref] have yielded encouraging results in these directions already.

    Scalar-Tensor theories within Asymptotic Safety · Introduction · 0.81

What it cites · 12 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper
Uses the method or tool of 3 papers
Compares with 5 papers
Cites as background 5 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.