REVIEW 1 cited by
Poles of Karlsruhe-Helsinki KH80 and KA84 solutions extracted by using Laurent+Pietarinen method
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Poles of partial wave scattering matrices have also in hadron spectroscopy recently been established as a sole link between experiment and QCD theories and models [1-4]. We have, however, noticed the fact that Karlsruhe-Helsinki (KH) partial wave analyses, one of the two partial wave analyses which have been "above the line" in PDG [1] for over three decades, does calculate and PDG compiles the abundance of Breit-Wigner (BW) parameters obtained by local BW fit, but has produced only a limited number of pole information obtained by using speed plot (SP) method [5]. We stress the fact that in KH method only Mandelstam analyticity is used as a theoretical constraint, so KH partial wave solutions are as model independent as possible. Therefore, they represent a very confident and valuable input, so it is of extreme importance to extract as many resonance pole parameters from them as possible. In addition, the troubling fact is that BW parameters given in PDG have been obtained from KH80 solution, while pole parameters have been obtained from KA84 version of KH solution. To remedy this, we have used newly developed Laurent+Pietarinen expansion method [6,7] for obtaining pole positions for all partial waves for KH80 and KA84 solutions, compared them, and shown that the differences in pole parameters are, with very few discussed exceptions, negligible for all partial waves. We finally give a full set of pole parameters for both solutions for all partial waves; results which are until now unpublished.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Resolving the $\Delta(1232)$ partial width anomaly: Complex pole residue is not a fundamental resonance property
Using an improved Breit-Wigner model, the paper argues that complex pole residues are amplitude-level quantities, and shows how multi-resonance interference can make the Delta(1232) partial width appear to exceed its ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.