Pith. Sign in

RECORD

R-Parity Conservation from a Top Down Perspective

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 19 Mar 2014

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim An experimental observation of R-parity violation would, therefore, disfavor such classes of top-down GUT models.

how it is stated · asserted 0.81 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1403.4948 (version 2)
Pith IDH4UZU4VW, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBobby S. Acharya, Bob Zheng, Gordon L. Kane, Piyush Kumar, Ran Lu. "R-Parity Conservation from a Top Down Perspective." arXiv:1403.4948 (2014). https://pith.science/paper/H4UZU4VW
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,393 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.30 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.84 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Motivated by results from the LHC and dark matter searches, we study the possibility of phenomenologically viable R-parity violation in $SU(5)$ GUT models from a top-down point of view. We show that in contrast to the more model dependent bounds on the proton lifetime, the limits on neutrino masses provide a robust, stringent and complementary constraint on all $SU(5)$ GUT-based R-parity violating models. Focusing on well-motivated string/$M$ theory GUT frameworks with mechanisms for doublet-triplet splitting and a solution to the $\mu/B\mu$ problems, we show that imposing the neutrino mass bounds implies that R-parity violation is disfavored. The arguments can also be generalized to minimal $SO(10)$ GUTs. An experimental observation of R-parity violation would, therefore, disfavor such classes of top-down GUT models.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Motivated by results from the LHC and dark matter searches, we study the possibility of phenomenologically viable R-parity violation in $SU(5)$ GUT models from a top-down point of view. contribution 0.72 0.50 0.04 hedged possibility 0.74
s1 We show that in contrast to the more model dependent bounds on the proton lifetime, the limits on neutrino masses provide a robust, stringent and complementary constraint on all $SU(5)$ GUT-based R-parity violating models. result 0.94 0.82 0.34 asserted 1.00
s2 Focusing on well-motivated string/$M$ theory GUT frameworks with mechanisms for doublet-triplet splitting and a solution to the $\mu/B\mu$ problems, we show that imposing the neutrino mass bounds implies that R-parity violation is disfavored. result 0.90 0.90 0.49 asserted 0.99
s3 The arguments can also be generalized to minimal $SO(10)$ GUTs. result 0.55 0.62 0.04 asserted 0.66
s4 An experimental observation of R-parity violation would, therefore, disfavor such classes of top-down GUT models. interpretation 0.99 0.40 0.55 asserted 0.81

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from argument 0.64.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Motivated by results from the LHC and dark matter searches, we study the possibility of phenomenologically viable R-parity violation in $SU(5)$ GUT models from a top-down point of view. We show that in contrast to the more model dependent bounds on the proton lifetime, the limits on neutrino masses provide a robust, stringent and complementary constraint on all $SU(5)$ GUT-based R-parity violating models. Focusing on well-motivated string/$M$ theory GUT frameworks with mechanisms for doublet-triplet splitting and a solution to the $\mu/B\mu$ problems, we show that imposing the neutrino mass bounds implies that R-parity violation is disfavored. The arguments can also be generalized to minimal $SO(10)$ GUTs. An experimental observation of R-parity violation would, therefore, disfavor such classes of top-down GUT models.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper

What it cites · 93 sentences without a confident label

Uses data or values from 1 paper
  • Making the simplifying assumption $|M_1| = |M_2 | = |μ| = M$ and taking the large $tanβ$ limit, we can obtain a limit on $ξ$ from the constraint $m_ν < 0.23$ eV [ref] : [equation] To be consistent with this limit on $ξ$, the four vectors $(μ, κ_i)$ and $(v_d, ṽ_i)$ must be nearly parallel.

    Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters · Bilinear R-parity Violation $&$ Neutrino Mass constraints · 0.99

Cites as support 7 papers
Cites as background 6 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.