Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Can AMS-02 discriminate the origin of an anti-proton signal?

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 20 Jun 2014

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We investigate the two signals from different dark models and different supernova remnant parameters, as forecasted for the AMS-02, and show that they present a significant degeneracy.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1406.5377 (version 2)
Pith IDUCUTD3PM, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAndrea De Simone (SISSA, Antonio Riotto (University of Geneva), Enrico Morgante (University of Geneva), Giorgio Busoni (SISSA, INFN), University of Geneva), Valeria Pettorino (University of Heidelberg, Wei Xue (SISSA. "Can AMS-02 discriminate the origin of an anti-proton signal?." arXiv:1406.5377 (2014). https://pith.science/paper/UCUTD3PM
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,988 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.79 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.19 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.26 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Indirect searches can be used to test dark matter models against expected signals in various channels, in particular antiprotons. With antiproton data available soon at higher and higher energies, it is important to test the dark matter hypothesis against alternative astrophysical sources, e.g. secondaries accelerated in supernova remnants. We investigate the two signals from different dark models and different supernova remnant parameters, as forecasted for the AMS-02, and show that they present a significant degeneracy.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Indirect searches can be used to test dark matter models against expected signals in various channels, in particular antiprotons. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 hedged possibility 0.58
s1 With antiproton data available soon at higher and higher energies, it is important to test the dark matter hypothesis against alternative astrophysical sources, e.g. secondaries accelerated in supernova remnants. background 0.93 0.05 0.04 asserted 0.88
s2 We investigate the two signals from different dark models and different supernova remnant parameters, as forecasted for the AMS-02, and show that they present a significant degeneracy. result 0.76 0.91 0.89 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.71 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Indirect searches can be used to test dark matter models against expected signals in various channels, in particular antiprotons. With antiproton data available soon at higher and higher energies, it is important to test the dark matter hypothesis against alternative astrophysical sources, e.g. secondaries accelerated in supernova remnants. We investigate the two signals from different dark models and different supernova remnant parameters, as forecasted for the AMS-02, and show that they present a significant degeneracy.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

11 arXiv papers cite this in 14 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 9 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 4 papers

What it cites · 42 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 5 papers
Uses data or values from 2 papers
  • In the present paper, we have considered two propagation models, namely KRA and THK, defined from the choice of propagation parameters and injection spectra illustrated in Table II of Ref. [ref] , found by looking for good fits to B/C data and PAMELA proton data.

    Antiprotons from dark matter annihilation in the Galaxy: astrophysical uncertainties · Secondary antiprotons · 0.85

  • In the above expressions, $n_1$ and $u_1$ are the background gas target density and the fluid velocity in the upstream region of the shock, fixed as in Ref. [ref] to $2^-3$ and $0.5×10^-8/s$, respectively.

    High-energy antiprotons from old supernova remnants · Antiprotons accelerated in supernova remnants · 0.99

Compares with 2 papers
Cites as support 1 paper
  • First, the fact that no anomalous signal is seen in antiprotons data in the same range of energies puts severe constraints on DM properties [ref] and tends to favour the so-called leptophylic models, in which DM only couples to leptons.

    Indirect Searches for Dark Matter: a status review · Introduction · 0.96

Cites as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.