Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Real-Time Bidding Benchmarking with iPinYou Dataset

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1407.7073 v3 pith:KSHFZTFR submitted 2014-07-25 cs.GT cs.CY

classification cs.GTcs.CY
keywords datasetadvertisingbiddingoptimisationresearchavailablebenchmarkdisplay
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Being an emerging paradigm for display advertising, Real-Time Bidding (RTB) drives the focus of the bidding strategy from context to users' interest by computing a bid for each impression in real time. The data mining work and particularly the bidding strategy development becomes crucial in this performance-driven business. However, researchers in computational advertising area have been suffering from lack of publicly available benchmark datasets, which are essential to compare different algorithms and systems. Fortunately, a leading Chinese advertising technology company iPinYou decided to release the dataset used in its global RTB algorithm competition in 2013. The dataset includes logs of ad auctions, bids, impressions, clicks, and final conversions. These logs reflect the market environment as well as form a complete path of users' responses from advertisers' perspective. This dataset directly supports the experiments of some important research problems such as bid optimisation and CTR estimation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first publicly available dataset on RTB display advertising. Thus, they are valuable for reproducible research and understanding the whole RTB ecosystem. In this paper, we first provide the detailed statistical analysis of this dataset. Then we introduce the research problem of bid optimisation in RTB and the simple yet comprehensive evaluation protocol. Besides, a series of benchmark experiments are also conducted, including both click-through rate (CTR) estimation and bid optimisation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Coordination of Value-Maximizing Bidders

    cs.GT 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Letting only the highest-value auto-bidder compete improves both RoS compliance and total value compared with independent bidding, for overbidding and mirror-descent bidders.

  2. DCN^2: Interplay of Implicit Collision Weights and Explicit Cross Layers for Large-Scale Recommendation

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    DCN^2 augments DCNv2 with collision-weighted lookups, a dense-only cross layer, and an FFM-like similarity layer, and reports improved offline and online recommendation performance.

Pith tools