Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Experimental device-independent verification of quantum steering

Quantum Physics · Submitted 4 Aug 2014

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We present device-independent steering protocols that remove this need for trust, even when Bell nonlocality is not present.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1408.0563 (version 2)
Pith IDGENDMRHH, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAdam J. Bennet, Dylan J. Saunders, G. J. Pryde, Michael J. W. Hall, Sacha Kocsis. "Experimental device-independent verification of quantum steering." arXiv:1408.0563 (2014). https://pith.science/paper/GENDMRHH
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,536 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.11 · states limitation 0.23 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.91 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Bell nonlocality between distant quantum systems---i.e., joint correlations which violate a Bell inequality---can be verified without trusting the measurement devices used, nor those performing the measurements. This leads to unconditionally secure protocols for quantum information tasks such as cryptographic key distribution. However, complete verification of Bell nonlocality requires high detection efficiencies, and is not robust to the typical transmission losses that occur in long distance applications. In contrast, quantum steering, a weaker form of quantum correlation, can be verified for arbitrarily low detection efficiencies and high losses. The cost is that current steering-verification protocols require complete trust in one of the measurement devices and its operator, allowing only one-sided secure key distribution. We present device-independent steering protocols that remove this need for trust, even when Bell nonlocality is not present. We experimentally demonstrate this principle for singlet states and states that do not violate a Bell inequality.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Bell nonlocality between distant quantum systems---i.e., joint correlations which violate a Bell inequality---can be verified without trusting the measurement devices used, nor those performing the measurements. background 1.00 0.07 0.05 asserted 0.98
s1 This leads to unconditionally secure protocols for quantum information tasks such as cryptographic key distribution. background 0.81 0.05 0.04 asserted 0.99
s2 However, complete verification of Bell nonlocality requires high detection efficiencies, and is not robust to the typical transmission losses that occur in long distance applications. background 0.81 0.09 0.03 asserted 1.00
s3 In contrast, quantum steering, a weaker form of quantum correlation, can be verified for arbitrarily low detection efficiencies and high losses. background 0.98 0.09 0.08 asserted 0.98
s4 The cost is that current steering-verification protocols require complete trust in one of the measurement devices and its operator, allowing only one-sided secure key distribution. gap 0.54 0.05 0.05 asserted 1.00
s5 We present device-independent steering protocols that remove this need for trust, even when Bell nonlocality is not present. contribution 1.00 0.90 0.81 asserted 1.00
s6 We experimentally demonstrate this principle for singlet states and states that do not violate a Bell inequality. contribution 0.74 0.96 0.27 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.57 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Bell nonlocality between distant quantum systems---i.e., joint correlations which violate a Bell inequality---can be verified without trusting the measurement devices used, nor those performing the measurements. This leads to unconditionally secure protocols for quantum information tasks such as cryptographic key distribution. However, complete verification of Bell nonlocality requires high detection efficiencies, and is not robust to the typical transmission losses that occur in long distance applications. In contrast, quantum steering, a weaker form of quantum correlation, can be verified for arbitrarily low detection efficiencies and high losses. The cost is that current steering-verification protocols require complete trust in one of the measurement devices and its operator, allowing only one-sided secure key distribution. We present device-independent steering protocols that remove this need for trust, even when Bell nonlocality is not present. We experimentally demonstrate this principle for singlet states and states that do not violate a Bell inequality.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • Experimentally, at variance with the case of Bell tests, a demonstration of steering free of detection and locality loopholes is in reach [ref] , which makes one-sided device-independent QKD appealing for current technology and quantum steering a practically useful concept.

    Quantification of Gaussian quantum steering · Introduction · 0.96

Cites it as background 1 paper
  • Several experiments have been already performed, demonstrating steering and its asymmetry [ref] , and a number of recent studies have been devoted to improve our understanding of quantum steerability, ranging from the development of better criteria to detect steerable states [ref] , to the analysis of the distribution of steering among multiple parties [ref] .

    Quantification of Gaussian quantum steering · Introduction · 0.93

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.