How accurate are stellar ages based on stellar models? II. The impact of asteroseismology

J. Montalban; Marie-jo Goupil; Yveline Lebreton

How accurate are stellar ages based on stellar models? II. The impact of asteroseismology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1410.5337 v1 pith:ZFQMYHBC submitted 2014-10-20 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP

Yveline Lebreton , Marie-Jo Goupil , J. Montalban This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EP

keywords stellaragesaccuratestarsage-datedasteroseismologybestconstrained

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

0 comments

read the original abstract

Accurate and precise stellar ages are best determined for stars which are strongly observationally constrained, that is which are intrinsically oscillating. We review here the seismic diagnostics which are sensitive to stellar ages and provide some illustrating examples of seismically age-dated stars.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Uniform characterisation of an ensemble of main-sequence benchmark stars: effect of Gaia-based data on grid search models
astro-ph.SR 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Adding Gaia-based luminosities to grid-based asteroseismic modelling improves mass precision for main-sequence benchmarks but leaves radii systematically underestimated, and 1 per cent precise interferometric radii wo...

Pith tools