Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Where do goals come from? A Generic Approach to Autonomous Goal-System Development

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1410.5557 v1 pith:JYH6R2ML submitted 2014-10-21 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords goalsabstractionsagentscomputationalgoallatentlearningmechanisms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Goals express agents' intentions and allow them to organize their behavior based on low-dimensional abstractions of high-dimensional world states. How can agents develop such goals autonomously? This paper proposes a detailed conceptual and computational account to this longstanding problem. We argue to consider goals as high-level abstractions of lower-level intention mechanisms such as rewards and values, and point out that goals need to be considered alongside with a detection of the own actions' effects. We propose Latent Goal Analysis as a computational learning formulation thereof, and show constructively that any reward or value function can by explained by goals and such self-detection as latent mechanisms. We first show that learned goals provide a highly effective dimensionality reduction in a practical reinforcement learning problem. Then, we investigate a developmental scenario in which entirely task-unspecific rewards induced by visual saliency lead to self and goal representations that constitute goal-directed reaching.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CAREL: Instruction-guided reinforcement learning with cross-modal auxiliary objectives

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CAREL improves instruction-following RL sample efficiency by aligning observation sequences with instruction tokens via an X-CLIP style contrastive loss and masking completed subtasks.

Pith tools