Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Analytic structure of the $n = 7$ scattering amplitude in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM theory in multi-Regge kinematics: Conformal Regge cut contribution

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 9 Nov 2014

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The results are infrared finite and conformally invariant.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1411.2294 (version 1)
Pith ID55K4X3RT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAndrey Kormilitzin, Jochen Bartels, Lev N.Lipatov. "Analytic structure of the $n = 7$ scattering amplitude in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM theory in multi-Regge kinematics: Conformal Regge cut contribution." arXiv:1411.2294 (2014). https://pith.science/paper/55K4X3RT
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,332 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.15 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.11 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this second part of our investigation of the analytic structure of the $2\to5$ scattering amplitude in the planar limit of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM in multi-Regge kinematics we compute, in all kinematic regions, the Regge cut contributions in leading order. The results are infrared finite and conformally invariant.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this second part of our investigation of the analytic structure of the $2\to5$ scattering amplitude in the planar limit of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM in multi-Regge kinematics we compute, in all kinematic regions, the Regge cut contributions in leading order. contribution 1.00 0.95 0.42 asserted 1.00
s1 The results are infrared finite and conformally invariant. result 0.98 0.87 0.23 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.93.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this second part of our investigation of the analytic structure of the $2\to5$ scattering amplitude in the planar limit of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM in multi-Regge kinematics we compute, in all kinematic regions, the Regge cut contributions in leading order. The results are infrared finite and conformally invariant.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

17 arXiv papers cite this in 44 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 24 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Uses its method or tool 2 papers
Compares with it 3 papers
Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 11 papers

What it cites · 33 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Uses data or values from 1 paper
Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 24 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.