RECORD
Overview of Quantum Memory Protection and Adiabaticity Induction by Fast-Signal Control
Quantum Physics · Submitted 4 Dec 2014
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim It turns out that the quality of fast-modulated signal control is insensitive to configurations of the applied pulse sequences.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
A quantum memory or information processing device is subject to disturbance from its surrounding environment or inevitable leakage due to its contact with other systems. To tackle these problems, several control protocols have been proposed for quantum memory or storage. Among them, the fast-signal control or dynamical decoupling based on external pulse sequences provides a prevailing strategy aimed at suppressing decoherence and preventing the target systems from the leakage or diffusion process. In this paper, we review the applications of this protocol in protecting quantum memory under the non-Markovian dissipative noise and maintaining systems on finite speed adiabatic passages without leakage there-from. We analyze leakage and control perturbative and nonperturbative dynamical equations including second-order master equation, quantum-state-diffusion equation, and one-component master equation derived from Feshbach PQ-partitioning technique. It turns out that the quality of fast-modulated signal control is insensitive to configurations of the applied pulse sequences. Specifically, decoherence and leakage will be greatly suppressed as long as the control sequence is able to effectively shift the system beyond the bath cutoff frequency, almost independent of the details of the control sequences which could be ideal pulses, regular rectangular pulses, random pulses and even noisy pulses.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | A quantum memory or information processing device is subject to disturbance from its surrounding environment or inevitable leakage due to its contact with other systems. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 | asserted 0.99 |
| s1 | To tackle these problems, several control protocols have been proposed for quantum memory or storage. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Among them, the fast-signal control or dynamical decoupling based on external pulse sequences provides a prevailing strategy aimed at suppressing decoherence and preventing the target systems from the leakage or diffusion process. | background 0.98 | 0.04 | 0.04 | asserted 0.99 |
| s3 | In this paper, we review the applications of this protocol in protecting quantum memory under the non-Markovian dissipative noise and maintaining systems on finite speed adiabatic passages without leakage there-from. | contribution 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.09 | asserted 0.82 |
| s4 | We analyze leakage and control perturbative and nonperturbative dynamical equations including second-order master equation, quantum-state-diffusion equation, and one-component master equation derived from Feshbach PQ-partitioning technique. | method 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.04 | asserted 0.89 |
| s5 | It turns out that the quality of fast-modulated signal control is insensitive to configurations of the applied pulse sequences. | result 0.99 | 0.85 | 0.58 | asserted 1.00 |
| s6 | Specifically, decoherence and leakage will be greatly suppressed as long as the control sequence is able to effectively shift the system beyond the bath cutoff frequency, almost independent of the details of the control sequences which could be ideal pulses, regular rectangular pulses, random pulses and even noisy pulses. | result 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.72 | asserted 0.98 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
A quantum memory or information processing device is subject to disturbance from its surrounding environment or inevitable leakage due to its contact with other systems. To tackle these problems, several control protocols have been proposed for quantum memory or storage. Among them, the fast-signal control or dynamical decoupling based on external pulse sequences provides a prevailing strategy aimed at suppressing decoherence and preventing the target systems from the leakage or diffusion process. In this paper, we review the applications of this protocol in protecting quantum memory under the non-Markovian dissipative noise and maintaining systems on finite speed adiabatic passages without leakage there-from. We analyze leakage and control perturbative and nonperturbative dynamical equations including second-order master equation, quantum-state-diffusion equation, and one-component master equation derived from Feshbach PQ-partitioning technique. It turns out that the quality of fast-modulated signal control is insensitive to configurations of the applied pulse sequences. Specifically, decoherence and leakage will be greatly suppressed as long as the control sequence is able to effectively shift the system beyond the bath cutoff frequency, almost independent of the details of the control sequences which could be ideal pulses, regular rectangular pulses, random pulses and even noisy pulses.
Human review
References
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.