REVIEW 1 cited by
An Empirical Study of Mobile Ad Targeting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Advertising, long the financial mainstay of the web ecosystem, has become nearly ubiquitous in the world of mobile apps. While ad targeting on the web is fairly well understood, mobile ad targeting is much less studied. In this paper, we use empirical methods to collect a database of over 225,000 ads on 32 simulated devices hosting one of three distinct user profiles. We then analyze how the ads are targeted by correlating ads to potential targeting profiles using Bayes' rule and Pearson's chi squared test. This enables us to measure the prevalence of different forms of targeting. We find that nearly all ads show the effects of application- and time-based targeting, while we are able to identify location-based targeting in 43% of the ads and user-based targeting in 39%.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
PopSweeper: Automatically Detecting and Resolving App-Blocking Pop-Ups to Assist Automated Mobile GUI Testing
PopSweeper detects app-blocking pop-ups in mobile GUI screenshots with 93.5% recall and localizes their close buttons, but its real-time resolution claim is validated only in simulation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.