Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Cost of postselection in decision theory

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1504.03740 v2 pith:2U665GCP submitted 2015-04-14 quant-ph physics.data-an

classification quant-phphysics.data-an
keywords costpostselectiondecisiondiscardingdataeventoptimalwhen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Postselection is the process of discarding outcomes from statistical trials that are not the event one desires. Postselection can be useful in many applications where the cost of getting the wrong event is implicitly high. However, unless this cost is specified exactly, one might conclude that discarding all data is optimal. Here we analyze the optimal decision rules and quantum measurements in a decision theoretic setting where a prespecified cost is assigned to discarding data. Our scheme interpolates between unambiguous state discrimination (when the cost of postselection is zero) and a minimum error measurement (when the cost of postselection is maximal). We also relate our formulation to previous approaches which focus on minimizing the probability of indecision.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools