Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Signatures of Horndeski gravity on the Dark Matter Bispectrum

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1504.04341 v2 pith:TSSZOZDE submitted 2015-04-16 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
keywords bispectrumdarkmatterevolutiongeneralgravitygrowthlinear
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a detailed study of second-order matter perturbations for the general Horn- deski class of models. Being the most general scalar-tensor theory having second-order equations of motion, it includes many known gravity and dark energy theories and General Relativity with a cosmological constant as a specific case. This enables us to estimate the leading order dark matter bispectrum generated at late-times by gravitational instability. We parametrize the evolution of the first and second-order equations of motion as proposed by Bellini and Sawicki (2014), where the free functions of the theory are assumed to be proportional to the dark energy density. We show that it is unnatural to have large 10% ( 1%) deviations of the bispectrum introducing even larger ~ 30% (~ 5%) deviations in the linear growth rate. Considering that measurements of the linear growth rate have much higher signal-to-noise than bispectrum measurements, this indicates that for Horndeski models which reproduce the expansion history and the linear growth rate as predicted by GR the dark matter bispectrum kernel can be effectively modelled as the standard GR one. On the other hand, an observation of a large bispectrum deviation that can not be explained in terms of bias would imply either that the evolution of perturbations is strongly different than the evolution predicted by GR or that the theory of gravity is exotic (e.g., breaks the weak equivalence principle) and/or fine-tuned.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cosmic voids evolution in modified gravity via hydrodynamics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Voids in luminal Galileon gravity are always unscreened, and a reality requirement on the fifth force rules out ~82% of the favored parameter space, yielding a redshift-dependent minimum void depth.

  2. hi_class: Background Evolution, Initial Conditions and Approximation Schemes

    astro-ph.CO 2019-09 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    hi_class now evolves the background from covariant Horndeski Lagrangians, provides consistent radiation-era initial conditions for scalar perturbations, and applies a quasi-static approximation automatically where it is safe.

  3. EFT-Ramses: a code to simulate the effective field theory of dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5 of 10

    A unified AMR N-body code embeds EFTofDE α-basis models into one master Vainshtein equation and matches legacy ECOSMOG and HiCOLA matter power spectra.

  4. Modelling the matter bispectrum at small scales in modified gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2019-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    No existing matter-bispectrum model is accurate enough for Stage IV lensing surveys across the tested modified gravity theories, and a halo-model-corrected fitting formula is the most accurate option tested.

  5. Parametrizations for tests of gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2019-08 accept novelty 1.0 of 10

    A review of parametrized frameworks (PPF, EFT, PPN, ppE) for testing gravity across cosmological and astrophysical scales, with an outlook toward unification.

Pith tools