RECORD
Secondary antiprotons as a Galactic Dark Matter probe
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · Submitted 20 Apr 2015
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We use this result to determine the most conservative bounds on relevant Dark Matter (DM) annihilation channels: We find that the recent claim of a DM interpretation of a gamma-ray excess in the Galactic Center region cannot be ruled out by current antiproton data.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We present a novel determination of the astrophysical uncertainties associated to the secondary antiproton flux originating from cosmic-ray spallation on the interstellar gas. We select a set of propagation models compatible with the recent B/C data from PAMELA, and find those providing minimal and maximal antiproton fluxes in different energy ranges. We use this result to determine the most conservative bounds on relevant Dark Matter (DM) annihilation channels: We find that the recent claim of a DM interpretation of a gamma-ray excess in the Galactic Center region cannot be ruled out by current antiproton data. Finally, we discuss the impact of the recently released preliminary data from AMS-02. In particular, we provide a reference model compatible with proton, helium and B/C spectra from this experiment. Remarkably, the main propagation parameters of this model are in agreement with the best fit presented in our earlier statistical analyses. We also show that the antiproton-to-proton ratio does not exhibit any significant anomaly at high energy with respect to our predictions.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We present a novel determination of the astrophysical uncertainties associated to the secondary antiproton flux originating from cosmic-ray spallation on the interstellar gas. | contribution 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.06 | asserted 0.99 |
| s1 | We select a set of propagation models compatible with the recent B/C data from PAMELA, and find those providing minimal and maximal antiproton fluxes in different energy ranges. | method 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | We use this result to determine the most conservative bounds on relevant Dark Matter (DM) annihilation channels: We find that the recent claim of a DM interpretation of a gamma-ray excess in the Galactic Center region cannot be ruled out by current antiproton data. | result 0.68 | 0.94 | 0.74 | asserted 0.85 |
| s3 | Finally, we discuss the impact of the recently released preliminary data from AMS-02. | contribution 0.87 | 0.47 | 0.03 | unclear 0.53 |
| s4 | In particular, we provide a reference model compatible with proton, helium and B/C spectra from this experiment. | contribution 0.54 | 0.92 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | Remarkably, the main propagation parameters of this model are in agreement with the best fit presented in our earlier statistical analyses. | result 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.05 | asserted 0.99 |
| s6 | We also show that the antiproton-to-proton ratio does not exhibit any significant anomaly at high energy with respect to our predictions. | result 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.13 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We present a novel determination of the astrophysical uncertainties associated to the secondary antiproton flux originating from cosmic-ray spallation on the interstellar gas. We select a set of propagation models compatible with the recent B/C data from PAMELA, and find those providing minimal and maximal antiproton fluxes in different energy ranges. We use this result to determine the most conservative bounds on relevant Dark Matter (DM) annihilation channels: We find that the recent claim of a DM interpretation of a gamma-ray excess in the Galactic Center region cannot be ruled out by current antiproton data. Finally, we discuss the impact of the recently released preliminary data from AMS-02. In particular, we provide a reference model compatible with proton, helium and B/C spectra from this experiment. Remarkably, the main propagation parameters of this model are in agreement with the best fit presented in our earlier statistical analyses. We also show that the antiproton-to-proton ratio does not exhibit any significant anomaly at high energy with respect to our predictions.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
46 arXiv papers cite this in 65 sentences
Papers citing it · 51 sentences without a confident label
Uses its data or values 5 papers
-
with $K_0 = 2 ×10^28 cm^2s^-1$ and $δ= 0.42$ [ref] .
Can we explain AMS-02 antiproton and positron excesses simultaneously by nearby supernovae without pulsars nor dark matter? · Supernova explosions in a Dense Cloud · 0.90
-
In figure [ref] we show the ratio between the fragmentation timescale (computed with the two different models) and the diffusive escape timescale (obtained from fitting recent AMS-02 data in [ref] [The transport parameters corresponding to the best fit are: $D_0/H = 0.75 ×10^28$ cm$^2$/s/kpc, $δ= 0.42$, $v_A = 27$ km/s, $dV_C/dz = 14$ km/s/kpc.]).
Cosmic-ray propagation with DRAGON2: II. Nuclear interactions with the interstellar gas · Inelastic scattering · 0.89
-
In the calculation of Evoli et al. [ref] the ratio falls with energy with an exponent $α≃0.21$.
Interpretation of the cosmic ray positron and antiproton fluxes · Secondary Nuclei · 0.80
Compares with it 1 paper
-
(However, they may become more stringent if one takes propagation models or density profiles other than that adopted in Ref. [ref] .)
Revisiting Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Constraints on Dark-Matter Annihilation · Introduction · 0.89
Cites it as background 7 papers
-
Recent studies were done to get a set of injection and propagation parameters which could simultaneously reproduce a large set of nuclear data including proton, helium and carbon fluxes, the elemental ratio, and the isotopic ratio [ref] .
Dark Matter Search in Space: Combined Analysis of Cosmic Ray Antiproton-to-Proton Flux Ratio and Positron Flux Measured by AMS-02 · Astro-physical background · 0.82
-
Indirect detection with antiprotons is an important search strategy to test the dark matter (DM) self-annihilating nature predicted by thermal freeze-out scenarios [ref] .
Constraining heavy dark matter with cosmic-ray antiprotons · Introduction · 0.80
-
Cosmic-ray (CR) antiprotons are a powerful tool to investigate the particle nature of dark matter (DM), see, for example, [ref] .
Novel dark matter constraints from antiprotons in the light of AMS-02 · Introduction · 0.97
What it cites · 43 sentences without a confident label
Builds on 1 paper
-
Our main goal is to achieve a comprehensive evaluation of the relevant uncertainties affecting this computation, extending the work presented in [ref] .
Antiprotons from dark matter annihilation in the Galaxy: astrophysical uncertainties · Introduction · 1.00
Uses the method or tool of 6 papers
-
We compute the DM contribution to the antiproton flux as described in several previous works, e.g., [ref] .
Antiprotons from dark matter annihilation in the Galaxy: astrophysical uncertainties · Antiprotons from dark matter annihilations · 0.98
-
We compute the DM contribution to the antiproton flux as described in several previous works, e.g., [ref] .
Antiproton constraints on the GeV gamma-ray excess: a comprehensive analysis · Antiprotons from dark matter annihilations · 0.98
-
We model CR propagation in the Galaxy using the publicly available numerical code DRAGON [ref] .
Cosmic-Ray Nuclei, Antiprotons and Gamma-rays in the Galaxy: a New Diffusion Model · CR propagation in the ISM · 1.00
Uses data or values from 9 papers
-
In this paper we make use of the recent measurements of the B/C ratio, together with the proton, helium and light nuclei absolute spectra provided by the PAMELA collaboration [ref] to constrain the propagation parameters, and to accurately compute the secondary antiproton spectrum in the $0.1 - 10^3$ GeV energy range.
PAMELA Measurements of Cosmic-ray Proton and Helium Spectra · Introduction · 1.00
-
In this paper we make use of the recent measurements of the B/C ratio, together with the proton, helium and light nuclei absolute spectra provided by the PAMELA collaboration [ref] to constrain the propagation parameters, and to accurately compute the secondary antiproton spectrum in the $0.1 - 10^3$ GeV energy range.
Measurement of boron and carbon fluxes in cosmic rays with the PAMELA experiment · Introduction · 1.00
-
In particular, we consider as primary annihilation channels: $DM DM →b b̅$ and $DM DM →W^+W^-$, and we take the corresponding antiproton yields from the PPPC4DMID [ref] .
Weak Corrections are Relevant for Dark Matter Indirect Detection · Antiprotons from dark matter annihilations · 0.98
Compares with 7 papers
-
Our result is then consistent with the conclusions presented in [ref] .
AMS-02 antiprotons, at last! Secondary astrophysical component and immediate implications for Dark Matter · Conclusions · 0.95
-
Our results can be now compared with the DM interpretation of the recently claimed signal in the gamma-ray channel located in the inner few degrees around the GC [ref] .
The Characterization of the Gamma-Ray Signal from the Central Milky Way: A Compelling Case for Annihilating Dark Matter · Conservative limit on DM models from antiproton data · 0.87
-
In figure [ref] we compare our findings with the favored regions of annihilation cross sections connected to the GC excess as reported in [ref] .
Background model systematics for the Fermi GeV excess · Conservative limit on DM models from antiproton data · 0.98
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.