Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A generalization of the Zerilli master variable for a dynamical spherical spacetime

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 20 May 2015

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In particular, two master variables are obtained: one corresponding to the polar mode of the gravitational wave, whereas the other encodes the complete physical information about the perturbative matter degree of freedom.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1505.05278 (version 1)
Pith IDXWJ7IVUE, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDavid Brizuela. "A generalization of the Zerilli master variable for a dynamical spherical spacetime." arXiv:1505.05278 (2015). https://pith.science/paper/XWJ7IVUE
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,891 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.20 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.24 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The evolution of polar perturbations on a spherical background spacetime is analyzed. The matter content is assumed to be a massless scalar field.This provides a nontrivial dynamics to the background and the linearized equations of motion become much more involved than in the vacuum case. The analysis is performed in a Hamiltonian framework, which makes explicit the dynamical role of each of the variables. After performing a number of canonical transformations, it is possible to completely decouple the different perturbative degrees of freedom into constrained, pure-gauge and gauge-invariant variables. In particular, two master variables are obtained: one corresponding to the polar mode of the gravitational wave, whereas the other encodes the complete physical information about the perturbative matter degree of freedom. The evolution equations for these master variables are obtained and simplified.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The evolution of polar perturbations on a spherical background spacetime is analyzed. contribution 0.58 0.83 0.04 asserted 0.95
s1 The matter content is assumed to be a massless scalar field.This provides a nontrivial dynamics to the background and the linearized equations of motion become much more involved than in the vacuum case. method 0.47 0.43 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 The analysis is performed in a Hamiltonian framework, which makes explicit the dynamical role of each of the variables. method 0.99 0.86 0.03 asserted 1.00
s3 After performing a number of canonical transformations, it is possible to completely decouple the different perturbative degrees of freedom into constrained, pure-gauge and gauge-invariant variables. method 0.61 0.92 0.20 hedged possibility 0.54
s4 In particular, two master variables are obtained: one corresponding to the polar mode of the gravitational wave, whereas the other encodes the complete physical information about the perturbative matter degree of freedom. result 0.91 0.92 0.62 asserted 1.00
s5 The evolution equations for these master variables are obtained and simplified. result 0.63 0.94 0.19 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The evolution of polar perturbations on a spherical background spacetime is analyzed. The matter content is assumed to be a massless scalar field.This provides a nontrivial dynamics to the background and the linearized equations of motion become much more involved than in the vacuum case. The analysis is performed in a Hamiltonian framework, which makes explicit the dynamical role of each of the variables. After performing a number of canonical transformations, it is possible to completely decouple the different perturbative degrees of freedom into constrained, pure-gauge and gauge-invariant variables. In particular, two master variables are obtained: one corresponding to the polar mode of the gravitational wave, whereas the other encodes the complete physical information about the perturbative matter degree of freedom. The evolution equations for these master variables are obtained and simplified.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 9 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 4 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 2 papers
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.