Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Pseudo-Dimension of Near-Optimal Auctions

Computer Science and Game Theory · Submitted 11 Jun 2015

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim One consequence of our results is that, in arbitrary single-parameter settings, one can learn a mechanism with expected revenue arbitrarily close to optimal from a polynomial number of samples.

how it is stated · asserted 0.90 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1506.03684 (version 1)
Pith IDMCQ4R22V, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJamie Morgenstern, Tim Roughgarden. "The Pseudo-Dimension of Near-Optimal Auctions." arXiv:1506.03684 (2015). https://pith.science/paper/MCQ4R22V
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,365 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.42 · compares with prior results 0.34 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This paper develops a general approach, rooted in statistical learning theory, to learning an approximately revenue-maximizing auction from data. We introduce $t$-level auctions to interpolate between simple auctions, such as welfare maximization with reserve prices, and optimal auctions, thereby balancing the competing demands of expressivity and simplicity. We prove that such auctions have small representation error, in the sense that for every product distribution $F$ over bidders' valuations, there exists a $t$-level auction with small $t$ and expected revenue close to optimal. We show that the set of $t$-level auctions has modest pseudo-dimension (for polynomial $t$) and therefore leads to small learning error. One consequence of our results is that, in arbitrary single-parameter settings, one can learn a mechanism with expected revenue arbitrarily close to optimal from a polynomial number of samples.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This paper develops a general approach, rooted in statistical learning theory, to learning an approximately revenue-maximizing auction from data. contribution 0.98 0.94 0.10 asserted 1.00
s1 We introduce $t$-level auctions to interpolate between simple auctions, such as welfare maximization with reserve prices, and optimal auctions, thereby balancing the competing demands of expressivity and simplicity. contribution 0.71 0.92 0.05 asserted 0.99
s2 We prove that such auctions have small representation error, in the sense that for every product distribution $F$ over bidders' valuations, there exists a $t$-level auction with small $t$ and expected revenue close to optimal. result 0.98 0.92 0.16 asserted 1.00
s3 We show that the set of $t$-level auctions has modest pseudo-dimension (for polynomial $t$) and therefore leads to small learning error. result 0.96 0.95 0.14 asserted 1.00
s4 One consequence of our results is that, in arbitrary single-parameter settings, one can learn a mechanism with expected revenue arbitrarily close to optimal from a polynomial number of samples. interpretation 0.90 0.90 0.67 asserted 0.90

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.86 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This paper develops a general approach, rooted in statistical learning theory, to learning an approximately revenue-maximizing auction from data. We introduce $t$-level auctions to interpolate between simple auctions, such as welfare maximization with reserve prices, and optimal auctions, thereby balancing the competing demands of expressivity and simplicity. We prove that such auctions have small representation error, in the sense that for every product distribution $F$ over bidders' valuations, there exists a $t$-level auction with small $t$ and expected revenue close to optimal. We show that the set of $t$-level auctions has modest pseudo-dimension (for polynomial $t$) and therefore leads to small learning error. One consequence of our results is that, in arbitrary single-parameter settings, one can learn a mechanism with expected revenue arbitrarily close to optimal from a polynomial number of samples.

Human review
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 3 papers
  • Recent work has explored settings of learning approximately optimal auction from samples, both for single-item auctions [ref] , and multi-item auctions [ref] .

    Robust Learning of Optimal Auctions · Related work · 0.99

  • This work has lead to an almost complete picture for the single-item (and the more general single-parameter) setting where Myerson's theory applies, showing how near-optimal mechanisms can be learned from polynomially many (in the approximation and the number of bidders) samples [ref] .

    Learning Multi-item Auctions with (or without) Samples · Introduction · 0.82

  • The research in this line has advanced from single-unit auctions [ref] to general single-parametric agents [ref] to multi-parameter unit-demand buyers [ref] .

    Double Auctions in Markets for Multiple Kinds of Goods · Random Sampling · 0.85

What it cites

Compares with 1 paper
  • Our general positive results obviously cover the bounded-valuation and MHR settings in [ref] , though the specialized analysis in [ref] yields better (indeed, almost optimal) sample complexity bounds, as a function of $^-1$ and/or $H$.

    Making the Most of Your Samples · Related Work · 0.98

Cites as background 1 paper
  • [ref] consider learning the optimal price from samples when there is a single buyer and a single seller; this problem was also studied implicitly in [ref] .

    Making the Most of Your Samples · Related Work · 0.88

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.