Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Differentially Private Ordinary Least Squares

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1507.02482 v4 pith:B5G3UEIJ submitted 2015-07-09 cs.DS cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.DScs.CRcs.LG
keywords correlationdataemphregressionconfidenceintervallineartrue
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Linear regression is one of the most prevalent techniques in machine learning, however, it is also common to use linear regression for its \emph{explanatory} capabilities rather than label prediction. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) is often used in statistics to establish a correlation between an attribute (e.g. gender) and a label (e.g. income) in the presence of other (potentially correlated) features. OLS assumes a particular model that randomly generates the data, and derives \emph{$t$-values} --- representing the likelihood of each real value to be the true correlation. Using $t$-values, OLS can release a \emph{confidence interval}, which is an interval on the reals that is likely to contain the true correlation, and when this interval does not intersect the origin, we can \emph{reject the null hypothesis} as it is likely that the true correlation is non-zero. Our work aims at achieving similar guarantees on data under differentially private estimators. First, we show that for well-spread data, the Gaussian Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform (JLT) gives a very good approximation of $t$-values, secondly, when JLT approximates Ridge regression (linear regression with $l_2$-regularization) we derive, under certain conditions, confidence intervals using the projected data, lastly, we derive, under different conditions, confidence intervals for the "Analyze Gauss" algorithm (Dwork et al, STOC 2014).

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Computational Attestations of Polynomial Integrity Towards Verifiable Machine-Learning

    cs.CR 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A differentially private linear regression over 50,000 samples is proven inside the RISC Zero ZKVM in under six minutes and verified in 0.17 seconds.

Pith tools