Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Quantum search followed by classical search versus quantum search alone

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
P. R. M. Sousa, F. V. Mendes, R. V. Ramos

Quantum Physics · Submitted 31 Jul 2015

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this work, we show that the usage of a quantum gate that gives extra information about the solution searched permits to improve the performance of the search algorithm by switching from quantum to classical search in the appropriated moment.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1507.08947 (version 2)
Pith ID3MLNRFBX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationF. V. Mendes, P. R. M. Sousa, R. V. Ramos. "Quantum search followed by classical search versus quantum search alone." arXiv:1507.08947 (2015). https://pith.science/paper/3MLNRFBX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,262 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.93 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this work, we show that the usage of a quantum gate that gives extra information about the solution searched permits to improve the performance of the search algorithm by switching from quantum to classical search in the appropriated moment. A comparison to the case where only quantum search is used is also realized.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this work, we show that the usage of a quantum gate that gives extra information about the solution searched permits to improve the performance of the search algorithm by switching from quantum to classical search in the appropriated moment. result 0.58 0.90 0.92 asserted 1.00
s1 A comparison to the case where only quantum search is used is also realized. method 0.58 0.86 0.05 asserted 0.62

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.83 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.57.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this work, we show that the usage of a quantum gate that gives extra information about the solution searched permits to improve the performance of the search algorithm by switching from quantum to classical search in the appropriated moment. A comparison to the case where only quantum search is used is also realized.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.