REVIEW 2 cited by
Relation Classification via Recurrent Neural Network
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep learning has gained much success in sentence-level relation classification. For example, convolutional neural networks (CNN) have delivered competitive performance without much effort on feature engineering as the conventional pattern-based methods. Thus a lot of works have been produced based on CNN structures. However, a key issue that has not been well addressed by the CNN-based method is the lack of capability to learn temporal features, especially long-distance dependency between nominal pairs. In this paper, we propose a simple framework based on recurrent neural networks (RNN) and compare it with CNN-based model. To show the limitation of popular used SemEval-2010 Task 8 dataset, we introduce another dataset refined from MIMLRE(Angeli et al., 2014). Experiments on two different datasets strongly indicates that the RNN-based model can deliver better performance on relation classification, and it is particularly capable of learning long-distance relation patterns. This makes it suitable for real-world applications where complicated expressions are often involved.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MR-UIE: Multi-Perspective Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning for Universal Information Extraction
A pipeline that combines multi-perspective chain-of-thought reasoning with reinforcement learning for universal information extraction, showing modest gains that are overstated in the text.
-
Extracting Structured Requirements from Unstructured Building Technical Specifications for Building Information Modeling
A study showing that CamemBERT and Fr_core_news_lg achieve over 90% F1 for named entity recognition and Random Forest achieves over 80% F1 for relation extraction on French building technical specifications.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.