Vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction in radiative processes of entangled states

G. Menezes; N. F. Svaiter

RECORD

Vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction in radiative processes of entangled states

G. Menezes, N. F. Svaiter

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 19 Aug 2015

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The possible relevance of the findings in the present work is discussed.

how it is stated · unclear 0.68 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID1508.04513 (version 3)

Pith IDQH3MCRIK, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationG. Menezes, N. F. Svaiter. "Vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction in radiative processes of entangled states." arXiv:1508.04513 (2015). https://pith.science/paper/QH3MCRIK

Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,850 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We investigate radiative processes of inertial two-level atoms in an entangled state interacting with a quantum electromagnetic field. Our intention is to clarify and to analyze the contributions of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction to the decay rate of the entangled state. The possible relevance of the findings in the present work is discussed.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We investigate radiative processes of inertial two-level atoms in an entangled state interacting with a quantum electromagnetic field.	contribution 0.99	0.84	0.03	asserted 0.66
s1	Our intention is to clarify and to analyze the contributions of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction to the decay rate of the entangled state.	contribution 0.84	0.26	0.07	unclear 0.75
s2	The possible relevance of the findings in the present work is discussed.	interpretation 0.84	0.34	0.03	unclear 0.68

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.92.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v3

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper

Original abstract

We investigate radiative processes of inertial two-level atoms in an entangled state interacting with a quantum electromagnetic field. Our intention is to clarify and to analyze the contributions of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction to the decay rate of the entangled state. The possible relevance of the findings in the present work is discussed.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper

This means that entanglement could serve as an interplay between radiation reaction (a classical concept) and vacuum fluctuations (quantum concept) [ref] .

Atom-field dynamics in curved spacetime · Unruh thermality in the atomic spectrum · 0.96

Cites it as background 4 papers

After discussing the case of a single detector, we shall go on to calculate the transition probability rate of two detectors that are assumed to be in an entangled initial state, a situation that has drawn considerable attention in the literature over the last few years (in this regard, see, for example, Refs. [ref] ; for a discussion on entangled detectors in circular motion, see, for instance, Refs. [ref] ).

Radiative processes of single and entangled detectors on circular trajectories in (2+1) dimensional Minkowski spacetime · Introduction · 0.91
Some of the directions that are considered in these study, broadly comprising the area of relativistic quantum information (RQI) [ref] , include understanding the radiative process of entangled relativistic particles [ref] , studying entanglement dynamics [ref] , studying entangled Unruh Otto engines [ref] , and entanglement harvesting [ref] .

Optimization of entanglement depends on whether a black hole is extremal · Introduction · 0.99
In particular, relativistic quantum information is becoming always more relevant [ref] .

Radiative Processes of Entangled Detectors in Rotating Frames · Introduction · 0.92

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Compares with 1 paper

This is a similar result as described in references [ref] .

Boundary effects on radiative processes of two entangled atoms · Rate of variation of the atomic energy in vacuum for static atoms · 0.97

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.