Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Determining the ground-state probability of a quantum simulation with product-state measurements

Quantum Physics · Submitted 21 Aug 2015

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this work, we quantify the extent of the diabatic excitation even if we do not know {\it a priori} what the complicated ground state is.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1508.05356 (version 1)
Pith IDIWDBK7DF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBryce Yoshimura, J. K. Freericks. "Determining the ground-state probability of a quantum simulation with product-state measurements." arXiv:1508.05356 (2015). https://pith.science/paper/IWDBK7DF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,649 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.29 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

One of the goals in quantum simulation is to adiabatically generate the ground state of a complicated Hamiltonian by starting with the ground state of a simple Hamiltonian and slowly evolving the system to the complicated one. If the evolution is adiabatic and the initial and final ground states are connected due to having the same symmetry, then the simulation will be successful. But in most experiments, adiabatic simulation is not possible because it would take too long, and the system has some level of diabatic excitation. In this work, we quantify the extent of the diabatic excitation even if we do not know {\it a priori} what the complicated ground state is. Since many quantum simulator platforms, like trapped ions, can measure the probabilities to be in a product state, we describe techniques that can employ these measurements to estimate the probability of being in the ground state of the system after the diabatic evolution. These techniques do not require one to know any properties about the Hamiltonian itself, nor to calculate its eigenstate properties. All the information is derived by analyzing the product-state measurements as functions of time.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 One of the goals in quantum simulation is to adiabatically generate the ground state of a complicated Hamiltonian by starting with the ground state of a simple Hamiltonian and slowly evolving the system to the complicated one. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 0.97
s1 If the evolution is adiabatic and the initial and final ground states are connected due to having the same symmetry, then the simulation will be successful. background 1.00 0.05 0.05 asserted 0.98
s2 But in most experiments, adiabatic simulation is not possible because it would take too long, and the system has some level of diabatic excitation. background 0.91 0.06 0.03 asserted 0.98
s3 In this work, we quantify the extent of the diabatic excitation even if we do not know {\it a priori} what the complicated ground state is. contribution 0.98 0.88 0.20 asserted 0.99
s4 Since many quantum simulator platforms, like trapped ions, can measure the probabilities to be in a product state, we describe techniques that can employ these measurements to estimate the probability of being in the ground state of the system after the diabatic evolution. method 0.75 0.70 0.18 asserted 0.75
s5 These techniques do not require one to know any properties about the Hamiltonian itself, nor to calculate its eigenstate properties. method 0.49 0.71 0.17 asserted 1.00
s6 All the information is derived by analyzing the product-state measurements as functions of time. method 0.98 0.75 0.18 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.72.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

One of the goals in quantum simulation is to adiabatically generate the ground state of a complicated Hamiltonian by starting with the ground state of a simple Hamiltonian and slowly evolving the system to the complicated one. If the evolution is adiabatic and the initial and final ground states are connected due to having the same symmetry, then the simulation will be successful. But in most experiments, adiabatic simulation is not possible because it would take too long, and the system has some level of diabatic excitation. In this work, we quantify the extent of the diabatic excitation even if we do not know {\it a priori} what the complicated ground state is. Since many quantum simulator platforms, like trapped ions, can measure the probabilities to be in a product state, we describe techniques that can employ these measurements to estimate the probability of being in the ground state of the system after the diabatic evolution. These techniques do not require one to know any properties about the Hamiltonian itself, nor to calculate its eigenstate properties. All the information is derived by analyzing the product-state measurements as functions of time.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.