Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Discovery of a second outbursting hyperluminous X-ray source

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · Submitted 1 Sep 2015

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We therefore conclude that CXO J122518.6+144545 is most likely an outbursting HLX.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.95 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1509.00329 (version 1)
Pith IDCJQ5IZTG, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationM. A. P. Torres, M. Heida, P. G. Jonker. "Discovery of a second outbursting hyperluminous X-ray source." arXiv:1509.00329 (2015). https://pith.science/paper/CJQ5IZTG
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,519 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.36 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.13 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We report on six Chandra and one HST/WFC3 observation of CXO J122518.6+144545, discovered by Jonker et al. (2010) as a candidate hyperluminous X-ray source (HLX), X-ray bright supernova or recoiling supermassive black hole at $L_X = 2.2 \times 10^{41}$ erg/s (if associated with the galaxy at 182 Mpc). We detect a new outburst of the source in a Chandra image obtained on Nov 20, 2014 and show that the X-ray count rate varies by a factor $> 60$. New HST/WFC3 observations obtained in 2014 show that the optical counterpart is still visible at $g' = 27.1 \pm 0.1$, $1 \pm 0.1$ magnitude fainter than in the discovery HST/ACS observation from 2003. This optical variability strongly suggests that the optical and X-ray source are related. Furthermore, these properties strongly favour an HLX nature of the source over the alternative scenarios. We therefore conclude that CXO J122518.6+144545 is most likely an outbursting HLX. It is only the second such object to be discovered, after HLX-1 in ESO 243-49. Its high X-ray luminosity makes it a strong candidate to host an intermediate mass black hole.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We report on six Chandra and one HST/WFC3 observation of CXO J122518.6+144545, discovered by Jonker et al. (2010) as a candidate hyperluminous X-ray source (HLX), X-ray bright supernova or recoiling supermassive black hole at $L_X = 2.2 \times 10^{41}$ erg/s (if associated with the galaxy at 182 Mpc). contribution 0.56 0.17 0.03 asserted 0.77
s1 We detect a new outburst of the source in a Chandra image obtained on Nov 20, 2014 and show that the X-ray count rate varies by a factor $> 60$. result 0.96 0.97 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 New HST/WFC3 observations obtained in 2014 show that the optical counterpart is still visible at $g' = 27.1 \pm 0.1$, $1 \pm 0.1$ magnitude fainter than in the discovery HST/ACS observation from 2003. result 1.00 0.93 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 This optical variability strongly suggests that the optical and X-ray source are related. interpretation 1.00 0.79 0.04 hedged possibility 1.00
s4 Furthermore, these properties strongly favour an HLX nature of the source over the alternative scenarios. interpretation 1.00 0.74 0.09 asserted 0.64
s5 We therefore conclude that CXO J122518.6+144545 is most likely an outbursting HLX. interpretation 0.95 0.83 0.97 hedged possibility 0.95
s6 It is only the second such object to be discovered, after HLX-1 in ESO 243-49. result 0.41 0.41 0.08 asserted 1.00
s7 Its high X-ray luminosity makes it a strong candidate to host an intermediate mass black hole. interpretation 1.00 0.47 0.05 hedged possibility 0.78

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We report on six Chandra and one HST/WFC3 observation of CXO J122518.6+144545, discovered by Jonker et al. (2010) as a candidate hyperluminous X-ray source (HLX), X-ray bright supernova or recoiling supermassive black hole at $L_X = 2.2 \times 10^{41}$ erg/s (if associated with the galaxy at 182 Mpc). We detect a new outburst of the source in a Chandra image obtained on Nov 20, 2014 and show that the X-ray count rate varies by a factor $> 60$. New HST/WFC3 observations obtained in 2014 show that the optical counterpart is still visible at $g' = 27.1 \pm 0.1$, $1 \pm 0.1$ magnitude fainter than in the discovery HST/ACS observation from 2003. This optical variability strongly suggests that the optical and X-ray source are related. Furthermore, these properties strongly favour an HLX nature of the source over the alternative scenarios. We therefore conclude that CXO J122518.6+144545 is most likely an outbursting HLX. It is only the second such object to be discovered, after HLX-1 in ESO 243-49. Its high X-ray luminosity makes it a strong candidate to host an intermediate mass black hole.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.