Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Developing and Comparing Single-arm and Dual-arm Regrasp

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1509.02302 v1 pith:5KPYVBPN submitted 2015-09-08 cs.RO

Developing and Comparing Single-arm and Dual-arm Regrasp

classification cs.RO
keywords regraspdual-armsingle-armalgorithmsgraspsobjectbetteroverlapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The goal of this paper is to develop efficient regrasp algorithms for single-arm and dual-arm regrasp and compares the performance of single-arm and dual-arm regrasp by running the two algorithms thousands of times. We focus on pick-and-place regrasp which reorients an object from one placement to another by using a sequence of pick-ups and place-downs. After analyzing the simulation results, we find dual-arm regrasp is not necessarily better than single-arm regrasp: Dual-arm regrasp is flexible. When the two hands can grasp the object with good clearance, dual-arm regrasp is better and has higher successful rate than single-arm regrasp. However, dual-arm regrasp suffers from geometric constraints caused by the two arms. When the grasps overlap, dual-arm regrasp is bad. Developers need to sample grasps with high density to reduce overlapping. This leads to exploded combinatorics in previous methods, but is possible with the algorithms presented in this paper. Following the results, practitioners may choose single-arm or dual-arm robots by considering the object shapes and grasps. Meanwhile, they can reduce overlapping and implement practical dual-arm regrasp by using the presented algorithms.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.