pith. sign in

arxiv: 1511.04508 · v2 · pith:5VT5H6V3new · submitted 2015-11-14 · 💻 cs.CR · cs.LG· cs.NE· stat.ML

Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks

classification 💻 cs.CR cs.LGcs.NEstat.ML
keywords adversarialdistillationdeepdefensivednnslearningeffectivenesssamples
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Deep learning algorithms have been shown to perform extremely well on many classical machine learning problems. However, recent studies have shown that deep learning, like other machine learning techniques, is vulnerable to adversarial samples: inputs crafted to force a deep neural network (DNN) to provide adversary-selected outputs. Such attacks can seriously undermine the security of the system supported by the DNN, sometimes with devastating consequences. For example, autonomous vehicles can be crashed, illicit or illegal content can bypass content filters, or biometric authentication systems can be manipulated to allow improper access. In this work, we introduce a defensive mechanism called defensive distillation to reduce the effectiveness of adversarial samples on DNNs. We analytically investigate the generalizability and robustness properties granted by the use of defensive distillation when training DNNs. We also empirically study the effectiveness of our defense mechanisms on two DNNs placed in adversarial settings. The study shows that defensive distillation can reduce effectiveness of sample creation from 95% to less than 0.5% on a studied DNN. Such dramatic gains can be explained by the fact that distillation leads gradients used in adversarial sample creation to be reduced by a factor of 10^30. We also find that distillation increases the average minimum number of features that need to be modified to create adversarial samples by about 800% on one of the DNNs we tested.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Why Blocking Targeted Adversarial Perturbations Impairs the Ability to Learn

    cs.LG 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Defensive distillation blocks non-targeted adversarial attacks but cannot block targeted ones without preventing the network from learning via its input gradient.

  2. Measuring the Transferability of Adversarial Examples

    cs.LG 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Empirical measurement of adversarial example transferability between VGG and Inception model classes with methodological refinements to attack strength selection, perturbation clipping, and evaluation via SSIM.