Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Towards Axion Monodromy Inflation with Warped KK-Modes

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 14 Dec 2015

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim While we have to leave this crucial issue to future studies, we find it interesting that such a simple and explicit stringy monodromy model allows an originally sub-Planckian axion to go through many periods with full quantitative control before back-reaction becomes strong.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1512.04463 (version 3)
Pith IDY4YIRRDR, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlexander Westphal, Arthur Hebecker, Jakob Moritz, Lukas T. Witkowski. "Towards Axion Monodromy Inflation with Warped KK-Modes." arXiv:1512.04463 (2015). https://pith.science/paper/Y4YIRRDR
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,688 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.97 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.13 · compares with prior results 0.18 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present a particularly simple model of axion monodromy: Our axion is the lowest-lying KK-mode of the RR-2-form-potential $C_2$ in the standard Klebanov-Strassler throat. One can think of this inflaton candidate as being defined by the integral of $C_2$ over the $S^2$ cycle of the throat. It obtains an exponentially small mass from the IR-region in which the $S^2$ shrinks to zero size both with respect to the Planck scale and the mass scale of local modes of the throat. Crucially, the $S^2$ cycle has to be shared between two throats, such that the second locus where the $S^2$ shrinks is also in a warped region. Well-known problems like the potentially dangerous back-reaction of brane/antibrane pairs and explicit supersymmetry breaking are not present in our scenario. However, the inflaton back-reaction starts to deform the geometry strongly once the field excursion approaches the Planck scale. We derive the system of differential equations required to treat this effect quantitatively. Numerical work is required to decide whether back-reaction makes the model suitable for realistic inflation. While we have to leave this crucial issue to future studies, we find it interesting that such a simple and explicit stringy monodromy model allows an originally sub-Planckian axion to go through many periods with full quantitative control before back-reaction becomes strong. Also, the mere existence of our ultra-light throat mode (with double exponentially suppressed mass) is noteworthy.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present a particularly simple model of axion monodromy: Our axion is the lowest-lying KK-mode of the RR-2-form-potential $C_2$ in the standard Klebanov-Strassler throat. contribution 0.98 0.84 0.11 asserted 1.00
s1 One can think of this inflaton candidate as being defined by the integral of $C_2$ over the $S^2$ cycle of the throat. contribution 0.63 0.34 0.04 hedged possibility 0.75
s2 It obtains an exponentially small mass from the IR-region in which the $S^2$ shrinks to zero size both with respect to the Planck scale and the mass scale of local modes of the throat. result 0.83 0.60 0.07 asserted 1.00
s3 Crucially, the $S^2$ cycle has to be shared between two throats, such that the second locus where the $S^2$ shrinks is also in a warped region. contribution 0.51 0.49 0.05 asserted 1.00
s4 Well-known problems like the potentially dangerous back-reaction of brane/antibrane pairs and explicit supersymmetry breaking are not present in our scenario. result 0.76 0.52 0.09 asserted 1.00
s5 However, the inflaton back-reaction starts to deform the geometry strongly once the field excursion approaches the Planck scale. limitation 0.83 0.71 0.12 asserted 0.91
s6 We derive the system of differential equations required to treat this effect quantitatively. method 0.74 0.94 0.04 asserted 0.99
s7 Numerical work is required to decide whether back-reaction makes the model suitable for realistic inflation. future work 0.62 0.30 0.09 asserted 0.85
s8 While we have to leave this crucial issue to future studies, we find it interesting that such a simple and explicit stringy monodromy model allows an originally sub-Planckian axion to go through many periods with full quantitative control before back-reaction becomes strong. interpretation 0.68 0.91 0.46 asserted 0.98
s9 Also, the mere existence of our ultra-light throat mode (with double exponentially suppressed mass) is noteworthy. interpretation 0.56 0.70 0.11 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.90.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present a particularly simple model of axion monodromy: Our axion is the lowest-lying KK-mode of the RR-2-form-potential $C_2$ in the standard Klebanov-Strassler throat. One can think of this inflaton candidate as being defined by the integral of $C_2$ over the $S^2$ cycle of the throat. It obtains an exponentially small mass from the IR-region in which the $S^2$ shrinks to zero size both with respect to the Planck scale and the mass scale of local modes of the throat. Crucially, the $S^2$ cycle has to be shared between two throats, such that the second locus where the $S^2$ shrinks is also in a warped region. Well-known problems like the potentially dangerous back-reaction of brane/antibrane pairs and explicit supersymmetry breaking are not present in our scenario. However, the inflaton back-reaction starts to deform the geometry strongly once the field excursion approaches the Planck scale. We derive the system of differential equations required to treat this effect quantitatively. Numerical work is required to decide whether back-reaction makes the model suitable for realistic inflation. While we have to leave this crucial issue to future studies, we find it interesting that such a simple and explicit stringy monodromy model allows an originally sub-Planckian axion to go through many periods with full quantitative control before back-reaction becomes strong. Also, the mere existence of our ultra-light throat mode (with double exponentially suppressed mass) is noteworthy.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

20 arXiv papers cite this in 29 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 15 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
  • In this paper, we present a novel type of ultralight axion which, as we argue, is generically present in the type IIB part of the landscape, building on a proposal made in [ref] .

    Thraxions: Ultralight Throat Axions · Introduction · 0.98

Compares with it 1 paper
  • In this sense, our axion can be made approximately Planckian. * The mass of the axion is $𝒪(w_^3)$ which is parametrically smaller than both the warped Kaluza-Klein scale ($𝒪(w_)$), and the estimate of [ref] , where backreaction of the local geometry was not taken into account ($𝒪(w_^2)$).

    Thraxions: Ultralight Throat Axions · Discussion of Results · 0.92

Cites it as background 11 papers

What it cites · 45 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 4 papers
  • Inserting a $4d$ plane wave ansatz $ϕ(x,y)=e^ipx χ(y)$ with $p^2=-m^2$ the equations of motion take the form [equation] which can be brought into the form of a 1d Schrödinger equation [ref] (we follow explicitly [ref] ) [equation] with $z≡e^-ky$, $χ=z^3/2f$, $E=m^2/k^2$ and potential [equation] where $z_IR=1$ and $z_UV=e^-k L$.

    An Alternative to Compactification · KK-Reduction on the Effective 5d-Throat and the 4d Action · 0.86

  • Inserting a $4d$ plane wave ansatz $ϕ(x,y)=e^ipx χ(y)$ with $p^2=-m^2$ the equations of motion take the form [equation] which can be brought into the form of a 1d Schrödinger equation [ref] (we follow explicitly [ref] ) [equation] with $z≡e^-ky$, $χ=z^3/2f$, $E=m^2/k^2$ and potential [equation] where $z_IR=1$ and $z_UV=e^-k L$.

    Tachyons in Throat Cosmology · KK-Reduction on the Effective 5d-Throat and the 4d Action · 0.86

  • We now treat the throat as an effectively 5-dimensional Randall-Sundrum-model [ref] .

    A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension · KK-Reduction on the Effective 5d-Throat and the 4d Action · 0.92

Uses data or values from 1 paper
Compares with 3 papers
  • Using the 4d-Planck mass [ref] [equation] one immediately sees the double exponential suppression of the bound-mode: [equation] Note that this agrees with the expression for the axion-potential in equation (4.76) of [ref] where the potential comes from the NS5-DBI-action.

    A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension · KK-Reduction on the Effective 5d-Throat and the 4d Action · 0.83

  • Using the 4d-Planck mass [ref] [equation] one immediately sees the double exponential suppression of the bound-mode: [equation] Note that this agrees with the expression for the axion-potential in equation (4.76) of [ref] where the potential comes from the NS5-DBI-action.

    Gravity Waves and Linear Inflation from Axion Monodromy · KK-Reduction on the Effective 5d-Throat and the 4d Action · 0.83

  • The monodromy arises due to the homological triviality of the 2-cycle similar to models proposed in [ref] , rather than due to a coupling to branes.

    F-term Axion Monodromy Inflation · Conclusion · 0.80

Cites as support 2 papers
  • Back-reaction effects however generically lead to a flattening of the potential [ref] such that the model may well be in accord with current data.

    Simple exercises to flatten your potential · Conclusion · 0.99

  • Back-reaction effects however generically lead to a flattening of the potential [ref] such that the model may well be in accord with current data.

    The Powers of Monodromy · Conclusion · 0.99

Cites as background 36 papers
  • A monodromy for axions can be induced by couplings to branes [ref] (see [ref] for very recent progress), but also due to background fluxes [ref] (recently established in the supergravity context under the name of $F$-term axion monodromy inflation [ref] ).

    D6-branes and axion monodromy inflation · Introduction · 0.84

  • A monodromy for axions can be induced by couplings to branes [ref] (see [ref] for very recent progress), but also due to background fluxes [ref] (recently established in the supergravity context under the name of $F$-term axion monodromy inflation [ref] ).

    Gravity Waves and Linear Inflation from Axion Monodromy · Introduction · 0.84

  • A monodromy for axions can be induced by couplings to branes [ref] (see [ref] for very recent progress), but also due to background fluxes [ref] (recently established in the supergravity context under the name of $F$-term axion monodromy inflation [ref] ).

    Simple exercises to flatten your potential · Introduction · 0.84

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.