REVIEW 2 cited by
End-to-End Relation Extraction using LSTMs on Sequences and Tree Structures
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present a novel end-to-end neural model to extract entities and relations between them. Our recurrent neural network based model captures both word sequence and dependency tree substructure information by stacking bidirectional tree-structured LSTM-RNNs on bidirectional sequential LSTM-RNNs. This allows our model to jointly represent both entities and relations with shared parameters in a single model. We further encourage detection of entities during training and use of entity information in relation extraction via entity pretraining and scheduled sampling. Our model improves over the state-of-the-art feature-based model on end-to-end relation extraction, achieving 12.1% and 5.7% relative error reductions in F1-score on ACE2005 and ACE2004, respectively. We also show that our LSTM-RNN based model compares favorably to the state-of-the-art CNN based model (in F1-score) on nominal relation classification (SemEval-2010 Task 8). Finally, we present an extensive ablation analysis of several model components.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Small Language Model Makes an Effective Long Text Extractor
A smaller span-based NER model with a compressed plus-shaped attention mechanism extracts long entities from very long texts with less memory than prior span-based methods.
-
The Joint Entity-Relation Extraction Model Based on Span and Interactive Fusion Representation for Chinese Medical Texts with Complex Semantics
A joint entity-relation extraction model with cross-attention feature fusion is proposed and evaluated on a new Chinese drug-drug interaction dataset and on CoNLL04.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.