Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Ordering states with coherence measures

Quantum Physics · Submitted 15 Jan 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this paper, we consider the two well-known coherence measures, the $l_1$ norm of coherence and the relative entropy of coherence, to show that there are the states for which the two measures give a different ordering.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1601.03936 (version 3)
Pith ID3RBVLPS5, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC. L. Liu, D. M. Tong, G. F. Xu, Xiao-Dong Yu. "Ordering states with coherence measures." arXiv:1601.03936 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/3RBVLPS5
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,697 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.31 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.47 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The quantification of quantum coherence has attracted a growing attention, and based on various physical contexts, several coherence measures have been put forward. An interesting question is whether these coherence measures give the same ordering when they are used to quantify the coherence of quantum states. In this paper, we consider the two well-known coherence measures, the $l_1$ norm of coherence and the relative entropy of coherence, to show that there are the states for which the two measures give a different ordering. Our analysis can be extended to other coherence measures, and as an illustration of the extension we further consider the formation of coherence to show that the $l_1$ norm of coherence and the formation of coherence, as well as the relative entropy of coherence and the coherence of formation, do not give the same ordering too.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The quantification of quantum coherence has attracted a growing attention, and based on various physical contexts, several coherence measures have been put forward. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 An interesting question is whether these coherence measures give the same ordering when they are used to quantify the coherence of quantum states. gap 0.61 0.05 0.04 unclear 0.62
s2 In this paper, we consider the two well-known coherence measures, the $l_1$ norm of coherence and the relative entropy of coherence, to show that there are the states for which the two measures give a different ordering. result 0.55 0.92 0.82 asserted 1.00
s3 Our analysis can be extended to other coherence measures, and as an illustration of the extension we further consider the formation of coherence to show that the $l_1$ norm of coherence and the formation of coherence, as well as the relative entropy of coherence and the coherence of formation, do not give the same ordering too. result 0.71 0.93 0.24 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The quantification of quantum coherence has attracted a growing attention, and based on various physical contexts, several coherence measures have been put forward. An interesting question is whether these coherence measures give the same ordering when they are used to quantify the coherence of quantum states. In this paper, we consider the two well-known coherence measures, the $l_1$ norm of coherence and the relative entropy of coherence, to show that there are the states for which the two measures give a different ordering. Our analysis can be extended to other coherence measures, and as an illustration of the extension we further consider the formation of coherence to show that the $l_1$ norm of coherence and the formation of coherence, as well as the relative entropy of coherence and the coherence of formation, do not give the same ordering too.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 4 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 3 sentences without a confident label

Cites as background 2 papers
  • The general criterion has triggered the community's great interest [ref] ,and based on the criterion, various concrete measures of coherence have been given.

    Operational Resource Theory of Coherence · Introduction · 0.85

  • It has many significant applications in various subjects, such as quantum optics [ref] , quantum information [ref] , quantum biology [ref] , and thermodynamics [ref] .

    Thermodynamics of quantum coherence · Introduction · 0.86

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.