Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Interactive Storytelling over Document Collections

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1602.06566 v1 pith:767VAOPN submitted 2016-02-21 cs.AI cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.AIcs.LGstat.ML
keywords storytellingapproachdocumentsalgorithmsconstraintsconstructioninteractiveothers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Storytelling algorithms aim to 'connect the dots' between disparate documents by linking starting and ending documents through a series of intermediate documents. Existing storytelling algorithms are based on notions of coherence and connectivity, and thus the primary way by which users can steer the story construction is via design of suitable similarity functions. We present an alternative approach to storytelling wherein the user can interactively and iteratively provide 'must use' constraints to preferentially support the construction of some stories over others. The three innovations in our approach are distance measures based on (inferred) topic distributions, the use of constraints to define sets of linear inequalities over paths, and the introduction of slack and surplus variables to condition the topic distribution to preferentially emphasize desired terms over others. We describe experimental results to illustrate the effectiveness of our interactive storytelling approach over multiple text datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM Augmentations to support Analytical Reasoning over Multiple Documents

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLMs alone and with dynamic evidence tree augmentation still fail to produce the implicit, speculative reasoning that intelligence analysis requires.

Pith tools