Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Optimized Kernel Entropy Components

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1603.02806 v1 pith:IV6WYDSU submitted 2016-03-09 stat.ML cs.LG

Optimized Kernel Entropy Components

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords kernelkecaentropyfeaturesokecaparameteranalysisoptimized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This work addresses two main issues of the standard Kernel Entropy Component Analysis (KECA) algorithm: the optimization of the kernel decomposition and the optimization of the Gaussian kernel parameter. KECA roughly reduces to a sorting of the importance of kernel eigenvectors by entropy instead of by variance as in Kernel Principal Components Analysis. In this work, we propose an extension of the KECA method, named Optimized KECA (OKECA), that directly extracts the optimal features retaining most of the data entropy by means of compacting the information in very few features (often in just one or two). The proposed method produces features which have higher expressive power. In particular, it is based on the Independent Component Analysis (ICA) framework, and introduces an extra rotation to the eigen-decomposition, which is optimized via gradient ascent search. This maximum entropy preservation suggests that OKECA features are more efficient than KECA features for density estimation. In addition, a critical issue in both methods is the selection of the kernel parameter since it critically affects the resulting performance. Here we analyze the most common kernel length-scale selection criteria. Results of both methods are illustrated in different synthetic and real problems. Results show that 1) OKECA returns projections with more expressive power than KECA, 2) the most successful rule for estimating the kernel parameter is based on maximum likelihood, and 3) OKECA is more robust to the selection of the length-scale parameter in kernel density estimation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.