Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The micromechanics of nonlinear plastic modes

Soft Condensed Matter · Submitted 17 Mar 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The key result we present and explain is that the dynamics of NPMs and of destabilizing eigenmodes under external deformations follow different scaling laws with respect to the proximity to imminent instabilities.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1603.05455 (version 1)
Pith IDX2SW6GNA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationEdan Lerner. "The micromechanics of nonlinear plastic modes." arXiv:1603.05455 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/X2SW6GNA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,700 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.46 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.90 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Nonlinear plastic modes (NPMs) are collective displacements that are indicative of imminent plastic instabilities in elastic solids. In this work we formulate the atomistic theory that describes the reversible evolution of NPMs and their associated stiffnesses under external deformations. The deformation-dynamics of NPMs is compared to those of the analogous observables derived from atomistic linear elastic theory, namely destabilizing eigenmodes of the dynamical matrix and their associated eigenvalues. The key result we present and explain is that the dynamics of NPMs and of destabilizing eigenmodes under external deformations follow different scaling laws with respect to the proximity to imminent instabilities. In particular, destabilizing modes vary with a singular rate, whereas NPMs' exhibit no such singularity. As a result, NPMs converge much earlier than destabilizing eigenmodes to their common final form at plastic instabilities. This dynamical difference between NPMs and linear destabilizing eigenmodes underlines the usefulness of NPMs for predicting the locus and geometry of plastic instabilities, compared to their linear-elastic counterparts.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Nonlinear plastic modes (NPMs) are collective displacements that are indicative of imminent plastic instabilities in elastic solids. background 1.00 0.07 0.03 asserted 0.99
s1 In this work we formulate the atomistic theory that describes the reversible evolution of NPMs and their associated stiffnesses under external deformations. contribution 0.94 0.94 0.03 asserted 0.99
s2 The deformation-dynamics of NPMs is compared to those of the analogous observables derived from atomistic linear elastic theory, namely destabilizing eigenmodes of the dynamical matrix and their associated eigenvalues. method 0.67 0.78 0.03 asserted 0.93
s3 The key result we present and explain is that the dynamics of NPMs and of destabilizing eigenmodes under external deformations follow different scaling laws with respect to the proximity to imminent instabilities. result 0.99 0.93 0.89 asserted 1.00
s4 In particular, destabilizing modes vary with a singular rate, whereas NPMs' exhibit no such singularity. result 1.00 0.87 0.34 asserted 1.00
s5 As a result, NPMs converge much earlier than destabilizing eigenmodes to their common final form at plastic instabilities. result 0.95 0.87 0.18 asserted 1.00
s6 This dynamical difference between NPMs and linear destabilizing eigenmodes underlines the usefulness of NPMs for predicting the locus and geometry of plastic instabilities, compared to their linear-elastic counterparts. interpretation 1.00 0.70 0.30 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.83.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Nonlinear plastic modes (NPMs) are collective displacements that are indicative of imminent plastic instabilities in elastic solids. In this work we formulate the atomistic theory that describes the reversible evolution of NPMs and their associated stiffnesses under external deformations. The deformation-dynamics of NPMs is compared to those of the analogous observables derived from atomistic linear elastic theory, namely destabilizing eigenmodes of the dynamical matrix and their associated eigenvalues. The key result we present and explain is that the dynamics of NPMs and of destabilizing eigenmodes under external deformations follow different scaling laws with respect to the proximity to imminent instabilities. In particular, destabilizing modes vary with a singular rate, whereas NPMs' exhibit no such singularity. As a result, NPMs converge much earlier than destabilizing eigenmodes to their common final form at plastic instabilities. This dynamical difference between NPMs and linear destabilizing eigenmodes underlines the usefulness of NPMs for predicting the locus and geometry of plastic instabilities, compared to their linear-elastic counterparts.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 8 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.