Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Quantum backaction and noise interference in asymmetric two-cavity optomechanical systems

Quantum Physics · Submitted 6 Apr 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We explicitly demonstrate how quantum noise interference controls linear backaction effects, and show that this interference persists even outside the adiabatic limit.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1604.01703 (version 1)
Pith ID6RG2WFYT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAashish A. Clerk, Jack C. Sankey, Yariv Yanay. "Quantum backaction and noise interference in asymmetric two-cavity optomechanical systems." arXiv:1604.01703 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/6RG2WFYT
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,220 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.80 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.17 · compares with prior results 0.32 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study the effect of cavity damping asymmetries on backaction in a "membrane-in-the-middle" optomechanical system, where a mechanical mode modulates the coupling between two photonic modes. We show that in the adiabatic limit, this system generically realizes a dissipative optomechanical coupling, with an effective position-dependent photonic damping rate. The resulting quantum noise interference can be used to ground-state cool a mechanical resonator in the unresolved sideband regime. We explicitly demonstrate how quantum noise interference controls linear backaction effects, and show that this interference persists even outside the adiabatic limit. For a one-port cavity in the extreme bad-cavity limit, the interference allows one to cancel all linear backaction effects. This allows continuous measurements of position-squared, with no stringent constraints on the single-photon optomechanical coupling strength. In contrast, such a complete cancellation is not possible in the good cavity limit. This places strict bounds on the optomechanical coupling required for quantum non-demolition measurements of mechanical energy, even in a one-port device.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study the effect of cavity damping asymmetries on backaction in a "membrane-in-the-middle" optomechanical system, where a mechanical mode modulates the coupling between two photonic modes. contribution 0.94 0.69 0.05 asserted 0.84
s1 We show that in the adiabatic limit, this system generically realizes a dissipative optomechanical coupling, with an effective position-dependent photonic damping rate. result 0.95 0.90 0.19 asserted 1.00
s2 The resulting quantum noise interference can be used to ground-state cool a mechanical resonator in the unresolved sideband regime. result 0.90 0.79 0.29 hedged possibility 0.64
s3 We explicitly demonstrate how quantum noise interference controls linear backaction effects, and show that this interference persists even outside the adiabatic limit. result 0.78 0.92 0.26 asserted 1.00
s4 For a one-port cavity in the extreme bad-cavity limit, the interference allows one to cancel all linear backaction effects. result 1.00 0.76 0.17 asserted 0.64
s5 This allows continuous measurements of position-squared, with no stringent constraints on the single-photon optomechanical coupling strength. interpretation 0.59 0.73 0.13 asserted 0.87
s6 In contrast, such a complete cancellation is not possible in the good cavity limit. result 0.87 0.73 0.09 asserted 1.00
s7 This places strict bounds on the optomechanical coupling required for quantum non-demolition measurements of mechanical energy, even in a one-port device. interpretation 0.85 0.79 0.21 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.96.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study the effect of cavity damping asymmetries on backaction in a "membrane-in-the-middle" optomechanical system, where a mechanical mode modulates the coupling between two photonic modes. We show that in the adiabatic limit, this system generically realizes a dissipative optomechanical coupling, with an effective position-dependent photonic damping rate. The resulting quantum noise interference can be used to ground-state cool a mechanical resonator in the unresolved sideband regime. We explicitly demonstrate how quantum noise interference controls linear backaction effects, and show that this interference persists even outside the adiabatic limit. For a one-port cavity in the extreme bad-cavity limit, the interference allows one to cancel all linear backaction effects. This allows continuous measurements of position-squared, with no stringent constraints on the single-photon optomechanical coupling strength. In contrast, such a complete cancellation is not possible in the good cavity limit. This places strict bounds on the optomechanical coupling required for quantum non-demolition measurements of mechanical energy, even in a one-port device.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.