pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1604.05288 · v3 · submitted 2016-04-18 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.LG· math.PR

Recognition: unknown

Inductive Coherence

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.AI cs.LGmath.PR
keywords probabilitycoherentdistributionsapproximationscoherenceassigncomputationcomputations
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

While probability theory is normally applied to external environments, there has been some recent interest in probabilistic modeling of the outputs of computations that are too expensive to run. Since mathematical logic is a powerful tool for reasoning about computer programs, we consider this problem from the perspective of integrating probability and logic. Recent work on assigning probabilities to mathematical statements has used the concept of coherent distributions, which satisfy logical constraints such as the probability of a sentence and its negation summing to one. Although there are algorithms which converge to a coherent probability distribution in the limit, this yields only weak guarantees about finite approximations of these distributions. In our setting, this is a significant limitation: Coherent distributions assign probability one to all statements provable in a specific logical theory, such as Peano Arithmetic, which can prove what the output of any terminating computation is; thus, a coherent distribution must assign probability one to the output of any terminating computation. To model uncertainty about computations, we propose to work with approximations to coherent distributions. We introduce inductive coherence, a strengthening of coherence that provides appropriate constraints on finite approximations, and propose an algorithm which satisfies this criterion.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Concrete Problems in AI Safety

    cs.AI 2016-06 accept novelty 7.0

    The paper categorizes five concrete AI safety problems arising from flawed objectives, costly evaluation, and learning dynamics.