REVIEW 2 cited by
On the Sample Complexity of End-to-end Training vs. Semantic Abstraction Training
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We compare the end-to-end training approach to a modular approach in which a system is decomposed into semantically meaningful components. We focus on the sample complexity aspect, in the regime where an extremely high accuracy is necessary, as is the case in autonomous driving applications. We demonstrate cases in which the number of training examples required by the end-to-end approach is exponentially larger than the number of examples required by the semantic abstraction approach.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Deep sequence models tend to memorize geometrically; it is unclear why
Deep sequence models develop geometric memory in embeddings that encodes novel global relationships, transforming l-fold composition tasks into 1-step navigation via a natural spectral bias connected to Node2Vec.
-
From Foresight to Forethought: VLM-In-the-Loop Policy Steering via Latent Alignment
FOREWARN steers a diffusion robot policy at runtime by using a world model to predict latent futures and a vision-language model to narrate and rank those futures in natural language.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.