REVIEW 1 cited by
Status on bidimensional dark energy parameterizations using SNe Ia JLA and BAO datasets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Status on bidimensional dark energy parameterizations using SNe Ia JLA and BAO datasets
abstract
Using current observations forecast type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) Joint Lightcurve Analysis (JLA) and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), in this paper we investigate six bidimensional dark energy parameterisations in order to explore which has more constraining power. Our results indicate that for parameterisations that contain $z^2$-terms, the tension ($\sigma$-distance) between these datasets seems to be reduced and their behaviour are $<$1$\sigma$ compatible with $\Lambda$CDM. Also, the results obtained by performing their Bayesian evidence show a striking evidence in favour of the $\Lambda$CDM model, but only one parameterisation can be distinguish by around $1\%$ from the other models when the combination of datasets are considered.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
BAO miscalibration cannot rescue late-time solutions to the Hubble tension
Even after rescaling BAO data to prefer H0≈73 km/s/Mpc, none of six tested late-time dark-energy models can resolve the Hubble tension once unanchored SNeIa and CMB geometry are included.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.