RECORD
Implications of managing health related records and relevant information systems within intergovernmental agencies
Computers and Society · Submitted 28 May 2016
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The implications of intergovernmental agencies may forever change the way in which governments provide common services within a federated Australia.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The implications of intergovernmental agencies may forever change the way in which governments provide common services within a federated Australia. As governments seek to reduce duplication and inconsistencies across state and territory borders, intergovernmental agencies, born out of intergovernmental agreements, without any link to specific state or territory legislation, are challenging managers to develop, new approaches to procurement and implement information systems within this new legal dynamic framework. This paper considers the implications to managing health related records and their IT systems, having common legislative obligations across all Australia jurisdictions, to determine whether these new forms of government allow for the disposal of information, aimed at saving costs, improving the quality of data and reduce litigious risk. The paper also investigates the more general implications for any organisation operating nationally, to data sovereignty and how legislative ownership of records may predetermine how and where intergovernmental agencies can manage information assets.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The implications of intergovernmental agencies may forever change the way in which governments provide common services within a federated Australia. | background 0.93 | 0.06 | 0.08 | hedged possibility 1.00 |
| s1 | As governments seek to reduce duplication and inconsistencies across state and territory borders, intergovernmental agencies, born out of intergovernmental agreements, without any link to specific state or territory legislation, are challenging managers to develop, new approaches to procurement and implement information systems within this new legal dynamic framework. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.03 | asserted 0.99 |
| s2 | This paper considers the implications to managing health related records and their IT systems, having common legislative obligations across all Australia jurisdictions, to determine whether these new forms of government allow for the disposal of information, aimed at saving costs, improving the quality of data and reduce litigious risk. | contribution 1.00 | 0.39 | 0.11 | unclear 0.37 |
| s3 | The paper also investigates the more general implications for any organisation operating nationally, to data sovereignty and how legislative ownership of records may predetermine how and where intergovernmental agencies can manage information assets. | contribution 0.99 | 0.55 | 0.09 | hedged possibility 0.69 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The implications of intergovernmental agencies may forever change the way in which governments provide common services within a federated Australia. As governments seek to reduce duplication and inconsistencies across state and territory borders, intergovernmental agencies, born out of intergovernmental agreements, without any link to specific state or territory legislation, are challenging managers to develop, new approaches to procurement and implement information systems within this new legal dynamic framework. This paper considers the implications to managing health related records and their IT systems, having common legislative obligations across all Australia jurisdictions, to determine whether these new forms of government allow for the disposal of information, aimed at saving costs, improving the quality of data and reduce litigious risk. The paper also investigates the more general implications for any organisation operating nationally, to data sovereignty and how legislative ownership of records may predetermine how and where intergovernmental agencies can manage information assets.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.