Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Investigating nonclassicality of many qutrits by symmetric two-qubit operators

Quantum Physics · Submitted 30 Jun 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that this procedure partially resolves the discrepancy between maximal qutrit entanglement and maximal nonclassicality of qutrit correlations.

how it is stated · asserted 0.95 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1606.09603 (version 1)
Pith IDUIT5PEUS, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAdrian Kolodziejski, Kamil Kostrzewa, Marcin Markiewicz, Pawel Kurzynski, Wieslaw Laskowski. "Investigating nonclassicality of many qutrits by symmetric two-qubit operators." arXiv:1606.09603 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/UIT5PEUS
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,020 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.11 · states limitation 0.53 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.80 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We introduce a new method of investigating qutrit nonclassicality by translating qutrit operators to symmetric two-qubit operators. We show that this procedure partially resolves the discrepancy between maximal qutrit entanglement and maximal nonclassicality of qutrit correlations. Namely we express Bell operators corresponding to qutrit Bell inequalities in terms of symmetric two-qubit operators, and analyze the maximal quantum violation of a given Bell inequality from the qubit perspective. As an example we show that the two-qutrit CGLMP(Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu) Bell inequality can be seen as a combination of Mermin's and CHSH (Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt) qubit Bell inequalities, and therefore the optimal state violating this combination differs from the one which corresponds to the maximally entangled state of two qutrits. In addition, we discuss the same problem for a three qutrit inequality. We also demonstrate that the maximal quantum violation of the CGLMP inequality follows from complementarity of correlations.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We introduce a new method of investigating qutrit nonclassicality by translating qutrit operators to symmetric two-qubit operators. contribution 0.62 0.94 0.13 asserted 1.00
s1 We show that this procedure partially resolves the discrepancy between maximal qutrit entanglement and maximal nonclassicality of qutrit correlations. result 0.72 0.93 0.48 asserted 0.95
s2 Namely we express Bell operators corresponding to qutrit Bell inequalities in terms of symmetric two-qubit operators, and analyze the maximal quantum violation of a given Bell inequality from the qubit perspective. method 0.84 0.93 0.16 asserted 0.99
s3 As an example we show that the two-qutrit CGLMP(Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu) Bell inequality can be seen as a combination of Mermin's and CHSH (Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt) qubit Bell inequalities, and therefore the optimal state violating this combination differs from the one which corresponds to the maximally entangled state of two qutrits. result 0.89 0.88 0.24 asserted 1.00
s4 In addition, we discuss the same problem for a three qutrit inequality. contribution 1.00 0.83 0.05 asserted 0.85
s5 We also demonstrate that the maximal quantum violation of the CGLMP inequality follows from complementarity of correlations. result 0.77 0.90 0.17 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We introduce a new method of investigating qutrit nonclassicality by translating qutrit operators to symmetric two-qubit operators. We show that this procedure partially resolves the discrepancy between maximal qutrit entanglement and maximal nonclassicality of qutrit correlations. Namely we express Bell operators corresponding to qutrit Bell inequalities in terms of symmetric two-qubit operators, and analyze the maximal quantum violation of a given Bell inequality from the qubit perspective. As an example we show that the two-qutrit CGLMP(Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu) Bell inequality can be seen as a combination of Mermin's and CHSH (Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt) qubit Bell inequalities, and therefore the optimal state violating this combination differs from the one which corresponds to the maximally entangled state of two qutrits. In addition, we discuss the same problem for a three qutrit inequality. We also demonstrate that the maximal quantum violation of the CGLMP inequality follows from complementarity of correlations.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.